The cost of obtaining embryonic stem cells is unethical since it involves the inevitable destruction of human lives. Human embryos deserve respect as a form of human life and there is no justifiable reason to venture on the route of murder. "The human embryo is the weakest and least advantaged of our fellow human beings. No community is really strong if it will not carry its weakest members (Bourzac)." Banning embryonic stem cell research would give life a chance to happen since frozen embryos in labs could be implanted into a woman's uterus and become a child at any time.
The status of the human embryo and human embryonic stem cell research is a controversial issue as, with the present state of technology, the creation of a human embryonic stem cell line requires the destruction of a human embryo. Stem cell debates have motivated and reinvigorated the pro-life movement, whose members are concerned with the rights and status of the embryo as an early-aged human life. They can believe that embryonic stem cell research instrumentalizes and violates the sanctity of life and some also view it as tantamount to murder.  The fundamental assertion of those who oppose embryonic stem cell research is the belief that human life is inviolable, combined with the belief that human life begins when a sperm cell fertilizes an egg cell to form a single cell. A portion of stem cell researchers use embryos that were created but not used in in vitro fertility treatments to derive new stem cell lines.
Those three subjects from stem cells are embryos, fetuses or adults. I believe that embryos stem cells should be allowed and are necessary for the possibility of curing some patients with these diseases. That being said, in order to make embryo stem cells practical for therapeutic use, it would be necessary to create a new stem cell line for each patient that needs treatment. This is illegal in any government-funded laboratory in the U.S. It is being done in places like England and Korea, where researchers are now world leaders in this technology.
Though a catholic would disagree: in my opinion embryonic stem cell research should be carried out based on the fact it could possibly lead to to treatmemt of serious diseases. Religiously Catholics consider an embryo alive and a human being from the time of conception. The embryo has to be killed once the stem cells are taken. Therefore, Catholics look upon embryonic stem cell research as murder. However most of the embryos that are used are left over from
That is the people. Most people are fighting against stem cell research. The biggest conflict between the two sides is the ethical issue that the research is killing human beings. People against it are saying that a person begins when the egg is fertilized. So with that, they think the embryo is already a human being.
I believe it is right that infanticide is illegal because as soon as the baby is born it is a living, breathing human being. If a mother can’t take care of her baby then she should give it up for adoption instead of ending its life before it even has a chance. Nine months should be plenty of time for the decision to be made on whether or not to end the pregnancy. For the fact that disabilities can be detected so much sooner nowadays there shouldn’t be any need to end a pregnancy late-term. Personally, I believe early-term abortions with reason are acceptable, but infanticide should not ever be a
However, to obtain these miracle workers, researchers and medical practitioners must first crack open and kill a fertilized human egg to harvest them. On both sides of the argument, there are those who argue that the preservation of human life is at stake. The true question facing our nation, and the world for that matter, is whether or not to push forward with this research and fund it wholeheartedly or choose to censor it due to its questionable, if not damnable, ethicality. In order to correctly gauge the merits and shortcomings of each side, both arguments must be presented as fully and accurately as
Restrictions on embryonic stem cells (ESC) research should be lifted around the world because the research has made tremendous progress to cure multiple diseases, aid in the recovery of spinal injury, and human ESC being used by scientist were going to be discarded. ESC research restrictions should be lifted as long as obtaining the ESC does not harm the female carrying the embryos. Joannides and Chandran explain that despite ESC’s ability to reproduce into any cell that is needed, Scientists cannot use ESC as a “one size fits all” for every cell type and expect miracles. The ESC cells must be “custom made” into
This analogy however, is only applicable in the case of a pregnancy due to rape and is otherwise a disanalogy. Secondly, I will present Don Marquis’ “future likes ours” argument. Marquis argues that abortion deprives a foetus of future experiences is akin to a pre-mature human being’s death. For Marquis, abortion is just as wrong as murdering a human being. Marquis states that “The future of a standard foetus includes a set of experiences, projects, activities, and such which are identical with the futures of adult human beings and are identical with the futures of young children.” Marquis further adds that “it is wrong to kill human beings after the time of birth is a reason that also applies to foetuses, it follows that abortion is prima facie morally wrong.” Marquis remarks that killing deprives humans and foetuses the value of their future.
The next question to be posed to the public is, “Are there any other effective alternatives to embryonic stem cell research?” To the surprise of many it is in the area of adult stem cell research that has documented the most clinical success. Adult stem cell research has had an impressive impact over a wide range of health conditions: various forms of cancer, brain disorders such as tumors and stroke, juvenile diabetes, spinal injuries, cardiac repair after a heart attack, and corneal damage, just to name a few. According to an article in the Genetic Engineering news, adult-type stem cells are derived mainly from the cells of the umbilical cord and placentas, which are abundantly available, and most importantly are saving lives now. This successful research poses no ethical problems whatsoever. In comparison to embryonic stem cells that have never helped