During the time period from 1450 to 1750, two powerful empires were in the process of being built. These two empires were the Ottoman and the Spanish. During the building process of their empires, the Ottoman and the Spanish both developed many similarities in their political, social, and economic affairs. A major similarity between these empires was that they both had a similar slave system. Although the Ottoman and the Spanish had many similarities, they also had many differences.
The idea of European superiority and dominance drove the social structure of the "new world", (consisting mainly of North and Latin Americas and the Caribbean). Because of this dominant racial ideology, the native peoples of both regions were often subjects of discrimination and oppression. The extent of their mistreatment differed, as in North America they were simply pushed aside or confined to a certain area to live, while in the Caribbean and Latin America they were forced into servitude and labor. The dominant racial ideology of Europeans also fueled the slave trade that was prominent in the time period of 1500-1830, which involved shipping African slaves to the the Americas to increase the productivity of the colonies. In both areas, slaves were basically property, bought, sold, and traded to do specific and often labor intensive tasks.
The king would perform religious rituals to help the harvest because this would ensure prosperity in Egypt. Likewise, the Chinese government also consis ted of an emperor that would belong to a dynasty. Like in Egypt, a dynasty could rule until it woul d be eventually overthrown. The Chinese kings would also perform religious duties; they prayed, sac rificed, gave offerings and used oracle bones to call upon their ancestors. Both the Chinese and the Egyptian governments had similar structure and duties.
The intentions of both the encomienda system and system of Russian serfdom were the same, however, they differed in the foundation and functionality. Russian serfdom and the Spanish Encomienda system had many similarities. They were both systems of forced labor in which work was demanded from lower status people. Spanish settlers in the New World, particularly in the Caribbean were in need for a labor source to cultivate land and mine silver. After the rule of the Mongol over Russia, many of the free peasants had fallen into debt and were forced to work as laborers on the large estates owned by nobles.
Format the paper consistent with APA guidelines. Address the following points about 3 of the 4 countries in the scenario: 1. The benefits of working as part of a virtual team The benefit of working as part of a virtual team in China is the organization of management because the very elements of Chinese culture create & sustain group attachment & conformity & supports a rigid social hierarchy. The benefits of working as part of a virtual team in the United States is the effectiveness & quicker communication; because instead of sending messages by mail or fax, team members can communicate faster through email, instant messenger, & text messaging. The benefits of working as part of a virtual team in France is that the team members can learn a lot from each other as well as learn at a faster pace; because of the technological advances in computers & networking systems.
They are known for their contributions to its modern world. China and India are similar and different in many ways. Both China and India had many similarities and differences in politics, economics, and religion. Three dynastic cycles are the Zhou, the Qin, and the Han.
CHP. 5 S- China, at this time, was a hierarchy. People were divided into social classes. China also had dynasties- and each dynasty had its own set of rules and social structure. Rulers generally had many advantages, and the lowest class was slavery.
Two of the most prominent and wealthiest countries in history are the ancient Egyptians and the early civilizations of China and while comparing the two nations leaders, it would seem obvious that a pharaoh, as a god, would be more powerful than an emperor, to which the Chinese believed was appointed to be leader by the heavens. Under the Pharaoh in the social ladder would next come nobility, then priests, scribes, artisans, farmers, and at the very bottom of the social pyramid would be the slaves, who don’t have any rights. In China, though similar in some ways to the Egyptians arrangement of classes, have more branches such as under the emperor would be the nobles, who are extended family of the emperor’s or people he has favored. Then would it would be officials, farmers, artisans and metal workers, who were respected for their skills, but merchants would be last least in the social ladder because the people of China thought that they did not contribute for the good of the country but only looked for their own gain. After reviewing the social status I think that women in Egypt have more freedom than woman in China because in Egypt the women could own or sell property, they could file for a divorce, have rights to their inheritance, and pursue legal disputes in court, while in China they have to stay at home and sew or weave, but never have a say in anything.
The population provides the much needed labor force that has propelled the country’s industrial and agricultural sector to great heights of productivity. China’s population is the largest in the world. As per mid-2011, the country had a population of over 1.3 billion people (Rosenberg, 2011). This is a 20% representation of the World’s total population because the world population is estimated to be around 6.7 billion. Besides providing labor for industries, the large Chinese population forms a ready market for goods and services.
The competitive priorities of the custom the laptop bags produced in China are no different than the messenger bags produced in San Francisco. Both manufacturers in China and San Francisco main concern is to give customers a high quality and affordable custom bags; and by maintaining such standards, Timbuk2 will keep these bags in high demand by their customer base. The volume or rate of production of custom both San Francisco and China are essentially the same. The skills required by workers in San Francisco and China are even handed; both manufacturers have hardworking craftspeople. The level of automation is also even handed in San Francisco and