Homeschooling VS. Public Education Parents and teachers have many different opinions when it comes to which form of education is most effective. There has been a lot of research done to support both sides of this argument. After years of research it seems there are many pros and cons when comparing homeschooling and public education. Many parents that choose to homeschool their children do so because they believe that public schools would expose them to drugs, violence and a lack of religious teachings. Homeschooling also offers parents the opportunity to spend more time focusing on subjects they feel their child needs improvement on.
Many people believe that if a child has Special Educational Needs he/she should be educated in a special school. However the Special Educational Needs Act 2001 was intended to consolidate the SEN child’s right to a mainstream education. “The Act has amended the Education Act 1996 and transformed the statutory framework for inclusion into a positive endorsement of inclusion” (DfES/0774/2001, page 1). With this revised act the views of parents are taken into account in each individual case, if they want their child to attend a mainstream school then everything possible should be done to provide it. Inclusion and SEN has an impact on every aspect of learning within schools, no
His parents have been called to the school on several occasions to pick up their son and take him home. The child has also missed several days of school this year and it is a concern. His teacher contacted us with many concerns for this boy since he is at an early age in his life. She is worried that there maybe something wrong with him. The teacher wants to make sure he gets the help he needs in order to become a better student and child.
In other words, less education was needed to reach higher goals of that time. Today, this acquiring of knowledge through schooling over a period of many years is a basic necessity to succeed in life after school. The topic of education has been very controversial throughout the decades, and still continues to raise the tension within districts. The variety of opinions about education is endless, and we continue to question which path is the right one to take in order to achieve ultimate success in educational programs. A quote from The ASCD Committee on “Platform of Beliefs” describes how “the main purpose of the American school is to provide for the fullest possible development of each learner for living morally, creatively, and productively in a democratic society.” Education is meant to compose well-rounded, creative human beings that are able to think for themselves, who also possess the essential skills to exist in this competitive world we inhabit.
Although standardized tests have been around for a very long time, there is still a mountain of controversy surrounding, if they are helpful or a hindrance to our elementary and secondary school students. Upon researching the positives and negatives of these types of tests, I have concluded that standardized tests have a negative effect on education. Standardized tests are developed by states independently; therefore, each states test is different from another’s. According to Webster’s dictionary the word, standardize means, to make standard or uniform. Let us look back in history to see how our leaders have tried to reform our educational structure.
The Civil Right Movement brought about legislation in preventing prejudice towards people with disabilities allowing them the right to an education. Legislation made sure parents are well-informed of their rights concerning their child’s education and special instructions designed to meet their needs. The social implications of litigation on the lives of students with disabilities is giving students equality in education where teachers develop modification and accommodations to meet student’s academic and social goals. I would say thinking has changed dramatically regarding the understanding of students with disabilities. For, many people did not understand or had the true knowledge of disabilities and how to help students with disabilities.
The need to redefine is as certain as taxes and death. After all, is not change the direct prelude to progress and betterment? How that change is carried out, however, is just as important, and sometimes even more so, especially when it involves children. No matter how lengthy of a process, school districts considering redistricting have an obligation to include all who are affected as this would bring more accuracy, permanence, and empowerment to the community facing a tough challenge. As districts around the nation face a crisis in school overcrowding, implementing a redistricting plan in order to spread the student population to less crowded schools is a strategy which must be carried out with as much accurate results as possible.
In all actuality they may have a learning disability that has not been detected. Therefore parents should never take everything that a teacher says for face value especially if they believe that there is another reason for their child’s lack of success. The readings suggest that perhaps seeking the assistance of the school administration whenever parents don’t agree with a teacher’s diagnosis of a student’s learning problem. Public schools are required to assists parents that have concerns about students that have or may have learning disabilities. When all parties have reached a consensus that there is a greater problem than meets the eye, either psycho-educational testing is begun or the RTI model is initiated.
How do states meet the needs of ELL without breaking state laws? The controversy over educating ELL students is complex. In Massachusetts, a “state law bans teaching children in their own language” (Tachibana, 2007). This law made it difficult for states to meet the needs of their ELL students, who found themselves facing immersion earlier than school officials anticipated. In order to help these students succeed, states offered teachers a lot of professional development, enrolling the aide of “teachers who had led ELL professional development in the past” (Tachibana, 2007).
It represents performance-based evaluation, using a multidisciplinary approach, and use of holistic scoring. Educational practices for a student with a disability are driven by the content of his or her IEP, taking into consideration cognitive and behavioral strengths and challenges of the student. Requiring a student to attain a prescribed score on a generic assessment measure can be viewed as being in direct contrast to the intent of the IEP process to develop and implement an individual educational program (Albrecht & Joles, 2003). Two critical issues regarding alternate assessment are what should be tested and how should it be tested. The question of the assessment being appropriate for students with disabilities is also raised.