Edna St. Vincent Millay Vs. Anne Bradstreet

486 Words2 Pages
Edna St. Vincent Millay and Anne Bradstreet express both similar and different uses of literary elements such as theme, tone and style. This is made evident in the two love poems, “To My Dear and Loving Husband” by Anne Bradstreet and “Love is not all” by Edna St. Vincent Millay. The authors vividly convey the general idea of love to the audience and readers. Although both poems are similar, there are many differences between these poems as well. In Anne Bradstreet’s poem, “To My Dear and Loving Husband,” she intensifies the meaning of love by suggesting to the reader that she adores and loves her husband. The style is simple. Bradstreet perfects the straightforward, plain style form of writing. She uses figurative language to advocate her underlying love for her beloved husband. This is made evident in the line, “My love is such that rivers cannot quench.” The narrator wants to be with her husband forever, for eternity. The theme of Bradstreet’s poem is religious. She puts forward her belief that earthly love is a path towards heavenly love, which in her eyes she will be spending with her husband for an infinite amount of time. The way Bradstreet describes the bond between her and her husband sets a joyous and amorous tone. They are like one, so good together as she puts it. The adoring and passionate tone suggests the tenderness in the affectionate relationship between Bradstreet and her husband. In comparison to the poem by Anne Bradstreet, “Love is not all” by Edna St. Vincent Millay takes a much deeper thought to truly understand her view on love. The theme of love is present throughout both of these poems; however the style tends to differ. These literary works have the same style of writing; Bradstreet’s poem has more of a religious theme while Millay’s poem is centered around love as well but has a coy twist. The tone is also noticeably contrasting.
Open Document