Dylan Thomas Emily Dickenson

632 Words3 Pages
introduction Dylan Thomas and Emily Dickinson both had a fascination for death. Dickinson, who was a loner, was always attracted to the idea of expressing one’s emotions. She was a sensitive one who always analyzed the world around her. Her writing was to be described as “witty, epigrammatic, and often enigmatic” (Faulkner.) Thomas was a philanthropist who was also a sensitive spirit as well. His later works “begun to reveal the change in his attitude from one of doubt and fear to faith and hope, with love of God gained through love of humankind and the world of nature.” (Balakier). He began to doubt his relationship with his family which led him to led him to become dissatisfied life. Thomas later died of “alcohol abuse and related causes” (balakier). Dickinson’s Because I could not stop for death and Dylan Thomas’s do not go gentle into that good night both demonstrate the nature of death, however Dickinson explores the appreciation for life and abruptness of death, while Thomas contends death by showing remorse for death. Lit elements. Dylan Thomas poetry was written when his father fell ill and was on the verge of death. Two phrases that are mentioned throughout the tercets are “rage rage against the dying of the light.” and “ do not go gentle into that good night”. They are both similar in meaning to fight against death. Each tercets ends with the same message as it lists all types of men who “rage against the dying of the light”. In the first staza Thomas tells old men to “burn and rage” against “close of day” which is a metaphor for dying (balakier). In the next stanza, He writes about wise men who go against death. Although wise, Thomas says that “dark is right” meaning men will die regardless of how much they may go against it. In the third stanza good men are told to go against the dying light because their accomplishments “might have danced

More about Dylan Thomas Emily Dickenson

Open Document