America’s war on drugs can be won and drugs can be eliminated forever. People have to be cautious and not talk to shady strangers because they might be trying to sell you something illegal. People can avoid drugs and sorts of illegal things by becoming more knowledgeable on the subject. The law enforcement, anti-drug groups, or anybody can help eliminate by raising more awareness. They should spread the word and tell people taking drugs is against the law or that drugs are bad for your health or even that drugs can make you go bankrupt.
Critical Analysis on “The Missing Piece to the Gang-Violence Debate.” Dan Gardner’s publish, “The Missing Piece to the Gang-Violence Debate”, is strongly controversial in his position against increasing enforcement of drug laws, and boosting penalties for violators. He believes that you should actually limit enforcement and hardship of sentencing when it comes to drugs. Was his argument persuasive enough in the essay to actually influence his wishes into society? Personally, I don’t think so. Gardner’s ideas are too drastic and I believe he didn’t have enough support in his argument that his plans would actually decrease the murders in gang violence.
Bennett’s chapter against the legalization of drugs he speculates that the legalization of drugs would remove the criminal stigma that currently labels drug users. Bennett theorizes that a removal of this stigma would take with it the hesitation felt by the majority of people who see no positives in a life of crime. He is talking about every drug which one would agree that such a broad decriminalization would send our country into a downward spiral filled with addicted citizens barely able to function within society. The hard drugs that Bennett describes are in fact a danger to society such drugs like PCP, heroin or crack cocaine. However, he barely touches on the fact of marijuana alone.
The government has decided that addiction to these types of harmless drugs is okay, and then provides us with safe ways to access and ingest them. Could it be that the moment you turn to an illegal drug, you forfeit any chance of safety that the government could offer to you? Illegal drug use surrounds us every day, in fact, substance abuse is not a problem that will go away by banishing users to the streets; such attitudes only exacerbate this ever so common, serious issue. Critics argue that safe injection sites condone a criminal act, whereas, others argue that it’s better to focus on enabling addicts to practice the behavior more safely. While we must appreciate the moral perspectives some attempt to embody, good public policy must be measured by its effectiveness and ability to actually achieve the goals it is designed to respond to.
By making drugs legal we are lowering the standards of our country. Drugs are dangerous and can not only harm the person using them, but also the persons that user comes in contact with. If illegal drugs are legalized criminal acts, health problems due to drug use
First & Last Name: Abram Watson RDG 120 - Section#:512 Date 12/1/10 Claim In the article “Should Drugs Be Legalized?” by William J. Bennett, the claim is drugs should not be legalized because it would increase drug use, crime and ruin lives. Bennett refutes pro-legalizer’s arguments that the legalization of illicit drugs will 1) take the profit out of its sales and 2) dramatically reduce crime. In his opening remarks Bennett disagrees with those who favor legalization of drugs because they feel it is hopeless to fight against it. In paragraph 1 on page 7 he gives the key works” flawed, fatalistic ,hopeless and bankrupt the legislating” proponents use these arguments for legalizing various drugs. The claim is explicit.
Legalizing drugs in the U.S may stop the violence, drug trafficking and even give the government more control, but we will be putting today’s youth in a compromising position. In my opinion
This drug policy has accomplished its aims which has demonstrated that the crime control strategy does work. This again shows that the technique that America use by prohibiting alcohol and the method that the UK use within their drug policy have been a failure and both countries should take on board a more powerful strategy like a similar one to
The main purpose of random school drug testing is not to catch kids using drugs, it to keep them from ever using them. Once their using drugs its harder for them to break their addiction. With many employers drug testing its very important for a kid's future not to use drugs. Drug use is responsible for many crimes. Its really not worth kids to start at a young age.
The government was worried that the seller was not properly identifying the chemical substance by labeling the item and stating what was in the substance. They were also worried that the purchaser was not aware of all the possible side effects that could happen when taking the substance. The U.S. was trying to stop the use of drugs to help prevent criminal acts that could possibly happen while under the influence. 2b) The DAWN program is that