It could be you or your loved one in that small fraction. Also just because someone’s life wasn’t taken from texting and driving doesn’t mean it hasn’t affected their life in some way or another. For example, most of these collisions that don’t end in death either in my brain injury, paralyzation and so on. Texting is one of the most dangerous things you can do on the road. I can almost guarantee you that without awareness of this issue these numbers will continue to rise.
The posted speed limit was 60 per hour and he clocked him at 96 kilometre per hour. The police officer activated the lights on her cruiser, followed his vehicle and stopped him. He approached his vehicle and told him that he had stopped him for speeding. He gave his driver’s license, proof of ownership and insurance particulars. He said the officer had his face right down inside the vehicle and he detected odour of a fresh marijuana smell.
The current P-plate laws are extremely affective in reducing accidents on the road.This is because they deal with many of the dangers p-plate drivers face while driving, including distractions, driving speed, peer pressure and driver safety. To begin with, the current p-plate laws are affective in reducing accidents while driving because they deal with the important issue of distractions. An example of a distraction that is dealt with by the current p-plate laws is mobile phones. Mobile phones cannot be used by p-plate drivers when driving or while the car is moving or stopped but not parked. This helps to stop accidents because it removes distractions from a p-plate driver so they can focus solely on driving.
There are many similarities and differences between texting while driving and drinking while driving. Some of these differences and similarities would have to be that they both are illegal, they both impair the driver and they both cause accidents, injuries and death. Please let me remind you that they are both very dangerous and many people do them both every day. However, one can be more dangerous than the other, but I let you, the reader, decide which one is the most dangerous based upon the comparison and contrast I will make regarding texting while driving and drinking while driving. Both texting while driving and drinking while driving is illegal in all the United States.
Why some states such as my own force the seatbelt law would but yet let several motor cycle riders drive down a road without a helmet? I have to say, it is ridiculous. Truthfully, I believe that a driver to a car should have to wear a helmet as well as a seatbelt and to be honest; I don’t see anything wrong with a motorcyclist also having to wear the helmet “By Law”. I know it would be somewhat dangerous for the motorcyclist to wear a seatbelt considering if the person driving was to have a accident, they are normally thrown in mid air and the bike may possibly fall down up on he or she. What I don’t understand is, if the laws are pushing people to wear a seatbelt in a car and because of what I had mentioned above about the motorcycle, why are they allowed on the road in the first place?
He does not present enough proof to believe that less enforcement will in fact lower violence in gangs. Gangs are a complex and fairly intelligent corporation that will try and stop at nothing to get what they want with any means possible. Drugs do have a major role in gang violence, like Gardner says, but stopping the drug trade in my eyes won’t in fact end their
Sitz has to do with the police having the right to have checkpoints to catch people drinking and driving. The court reasoned that checkpoints are designed to eliminate immediate hazards posed by intoxicated drivers. This ruling may not seem substantially important to policing at first glance, but I feel keeping the public safe is a top priority for the police. These checkpoints enable the police to temporarily detain people who are, at that moment, a very serious threat to the public. The checkpoints have probably saved thousands of lives and this would not be possible if the police could only check for intoxication after someone has violated the law.
The Do’s and Don’ts on Warrants Renee Grant CJE 2673 Professor Callahan June 18, 2013 The Do’s and Don’ts on Warrants The usage of search warrants will prevent evidence that has been collected to be used in a court of law to help convict the suspect that is suspected of committing a crime. Not all searches require a search warrant though. There is always an exception to the rules. If an officer has probable cause, a warrant is not always needed. As well as, if an officer asks a person if s/he can search their car, and the individual agrees, there is no need for a warrant.
In 2007, I was a passenger in a vehicle that was initially pulled over for speeding. After the officer, noticed an open container (broken seal) of alcohol. Immediately the officer wrote two tickets, one for the driver and one for the passenger, even though the privately owned vehicle didn’t belong to me. I didn’t argue with the officer due to lack of knowledge with that particular law and didn’t want any extra trouble. The officer neglected to write an additional ticket to the driver for speeding.
One of the biggest causes of drunk driving is the person who hasn’t adequately prepared for the situation. They drive to the bar or party alone and end up drinking more than they had planned without thinking about how they’ll get home. Many drinkers, at this point, become too embarrassed to ask for a ride or underage drinkers are afraid they’ll get in trouble if they reveal they made a mistake. Others simply don’t care. They hear about the deaths and injuries and are aware of the risks and the potential