Most Insidious Aspect of 1984F Band Newspeak is the most insidious aspect of the dystopia society of 1984 because it prevents the advancement of one's ideas by constricting them to a certain form, and therefore destroying the chance of opposition. By controlling the range of thought through Newspeak's ever-diminishing vocabulary, people are unable to express themselves completely. Without the sufficient words to describe unorthodox thoughts, thoughts become impossible to be unorthodox. That is the ultimate goal of Newspeak. Newspeak enables doublethink and changing the past.
Euphemisms both help and hinder social harmony in society. On the one hand, euphemisms help navigate around social taboos, minimising offence and promoting social harmony. On the other, euphemistic doublespeak is employed by large public entities, such as the government and multinational corporations, to disguise truths and minimise responsibility as well as to manipulate the masses, impeding on social harmony. Hence, euphemisms are truly a context dependent linguistic tool. Euphemisms help promote social accord by navigating around social taboos.
People will think it is temporary but ignoring it will have already hurt the environment. Additionally, not only do people not notice such doublespeak, but even in the event that they identify doublespeak, they may not be against it because they do not understand its bad effects. Furthermore, he uses active words to express how doublespeak will hide reality from people. For instance, in the last two paragraphs, he states that doublespeak will produce “suspicions, cynicism, distrust and hostility”. He tries to get people’s attention to think about how doublespeak will disturb their lives.
His argument had effect the classification system, in DSM-IV the new identity are given to those patients so they would be accept by the society. However, there are still ethical concerns since the patients are still labeled as “abnormal”, even though they behave normal. Scheff argued that giving people labels would probably effect their behavior by self fulfilling prophecy, which means, people would behave in ways they think they are. They would automatically play the role of mentally disorder and show more obvious symptoms by knowing that they are mentally ill. Doherty argued that people who do not accept their labels are tend to improve faster, which means people who accept the labels did not improve as fast. In a study carried out by Langer and Abelson, it shows that people who are labeled as mentally dis order tend to endure discrimination.
Sometimes people feel the defendant has too many rights and has more benefits, which could help them get away with criminal activity. All these points are valid, but they are forgetting about the rights of people and what they stand for. I would think people would want defendants to be punished fairly and not have an opening, where they could possible get their case dropped because of something illegal done on the prosecution or law enforcement
Discursive Writing In 1984, are Orwell's fears purely about Stalinist Russia? Within 1984 we see the epitome of a dystopian society that has clear analogies to the events which George Orwell experienced and witnessed throughout his life. Orwell manages to implicate his many fears into 1984 as a warning for the future, which may or may not come to pass. It is evident when reading 1984 that the Orwell's fears come from the many spontaneous occurrences that surround his timeline. Many critics of Orwell state that the main fear which surrounds this piece of literature is that of the ever growing fear of Stalinist Russia during the mid - 20th century, he is an author who despised the idea of totalitarianism and conformity in any shape or form ; such a communist society is presented clearly in 1984.
Technology in every aspect can be misused by wrong people. Inventors or people can come up with an innovative invention to benefit people; however there are also people who would who would use this invention to do wrong things. Publius is a new technology that guarantees individuals the freedom of speech and to express their thoughts and not be victimized for what they say. Publius offer safety to certain levels that hackers or government entity cannot just read your file. In my opinion it is ethical to market Publius because it creates of open the door for people to speak out about the different malpractices that happen in their country and couldn’t speak about it.
Acts of armed robbery that end in violence or homicide tend to render the public outraged and give their voice a stronger demand for justice to be done. If we choose to take the stance that our criminal justice system is mean to only keep society safe and that justice is carried out then we need to recognize that the laws we have in place currently are set in place to do so. In theory we could see how enforcing a harsher sentence to those who choose to commit violent acts or armed robbery would work as a deterrent to prevent criminals from committing the act as often as they do
These results showed that because people find the pictures that harm our immune system more disgusting , we use the disgust gene as a protection against disease. Disgust is an evolutionary explanation of behaviour as without the disgust gene we would not be able to create offspring that can
The ones that are against racial profiling have thought of an alternative solution, which is behavioral profiling. Behavioral profiling, hence the name, means to base the law enforcers' suspicion according to that person’s behavior instead of race. With this more effective system, it balances our protection from both terrorism and violating someone’s civil rights. One reasonable example on why we shouldn’t racial profile is the popular bomber in United Kingdom, Richard Reid, who doesn’t fit the profile that they have created for terrorists. Individuals have also made good arguments about the negative outcome that racial profiling might bring to our society.