Doll House Reaction

583 Words3 Pages
Reaction to A Doll’s House We learned that a “well-made play” is classified as one with three acts. I would call A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen a well-made play for other reasons. I have to admit, before I reached the end, I had started to lose interest. However, I regained my interest in the dramatic conclusion. This ending may have been one of the better ones out of all of the pieces that we’ve read in this class. The ending of this play struck me with a potent quote that I think is so true. “You never loved me. You have only thought it pleasant to be in love with me.” Too often when these kinds of relationships aren’t taken maturely. Trovald wasn’t treating Nora with the proper kind of mature love. There’s a difference between saying that I love pizza, that I love my pet, or that I love my spouse. I don’t think Torvald realized that there’s more to the love of marriage than just physical pleasures. Through an outstanding display of similies, metaphors, and symbols, the ending of A Doll’s House made the issue of the play crystal clear that Torvald treated his wife more like a doll that he played with than a respectable partner. I concede that when this play was written in 1879, it was perfectly socially acceptable for women to be treated as less than equal to men. However, Torvald took this inferiority too far, as shown through the “terms of endearment” he called Nora. There’s nothing wrong with pet names, but it’s a different story when those pet names denote actually being treated like a pet. Torvald made me assume that Nora possessed the qualities of a ditzy blond, but Nora was actually quite intellectual the entire time, although her dynamic character did not show through until the end. My distaste of Torvald increased with his reasons for administering his amnesty to Nora. I actually kind of wished that Torvald would get mad enough with Nora to stop treating
Open Document