The article goes on to list several other problems with these laws. They punish innocent owners and dogs, they actually encourage ownership of these breeds by outlaws and those who intend to use the dogs for violence, and they give the public a false sense of security, which could endanger a person. The ASPCA cites the CDC on some other factors that could lead to dog bites rather than just what breed a dog is. This source is scholarly and reliable. The ASPCA is a well-known and trusted organization, the claims made in this article are backed up with facts and statistics, and many of these come from another trusted organization.
We are to keep the peace among the nations of the earth because that is our belief as a people, but we must know our enemy, we must know their intentions and what they wish to carry out. Terrorists do not adhere to the custom of respect of an individual. They act as animals, slaughtering without remorse. They do not deserve the rights of our nation or of man. The argument for the Justification of torture on terrorists is completely justifiable and the only course of action in ascertaining vital information for the nation’s defense.
I believe that it is not morally wrong to eat animals. While animals may be able to notice pain and emanate danger to themselves, I think that they have no real self awareness that would enable them to make judgments based upon these feelings. An example would be a moose that is being attacked by wolves. The moose tries to stay alive merely because it does not want to feel pain out of a basic instinct, not because it is aware of the fact it will die and cease to exist. I agree with carter in that without a language animals are unable to form thought and reason, and thereby have no realization of there existence.
Although it all depends on the situation, I manage to make things happen and not wait for the “flow” to take control of what goes on in my life. It’s a dog eat dog world, people will hurt anyone for their own benefit and a person shouldn’t let anyone walk over them. The Bride Comes to Yellow Sky Q: How does our society today compare to the society in The Bride Comes to Yellow Sky? A: At the end of the short story, Jack refuses to fight Scratchy. One difference is that when jack tells Scratchy that he had gotten married, Scratchy was in shock and backed off without a fight.
By not allowing his civilization to slip away, Simon is able to understand what the beast truly is: it is a savage instinct that is inside all of the boys that influences their every decision. Simon also shows morality when he tries to explain to the other boys that the beast does not exist. It would be easier for him to go along with Jack, and blend in with the crowd, but that is not his character. Simon knows that the beast does not exist, and he cannot be swayed away from this belief, because it would be against his moral
Dear Jeremy Rifkin: I personally agree with you viewpoint. I believe it is wrong for people to treat animals as if they don’t ha feelings. People need to realize that animals do have feelings; they feel pain, tress, affection, excitement, and love just as we do. This is why I am thankful to see that you put so much emotion and effort into getting the message out there for people to see that the way they treat animals is wrong and cruel. Animals have the right to live without being at any point, confined, exploited, tormented, or eaten.
Humans have more opportunities and chances on the way they want there life to be and animals really don’t have the choice even though they could also live where they want to live. Like I had said before, it would be nice to live like a weasel, but think about it, living like a weasel really means not caring for what others do, say. Like Henry David Thoreau stated, “Can there not be a government in which the majorities do not virtually decide right from wrong, but conscience”? We have the right to live how we want and where we want and by doing what we want, we are willing to face the consequences. Humans also have to worry about the ecnmical burden that comes with every thing.
Animals are pets, either household or wildlife, and either way they should not be physically or verbally abused. Leaving animals unattended for long periods of time can lead to major problems. Neglect, uncared for, and unhealthy environment are all ways of abuse. Starvation, yelling and beating are physical and verbal abuse. Most animals get spayed or neutered to prevent the animals from breeding with one another.
Some companies have a strong belief that animal testing is essential in order to make sure that consumers are protected during the use of their products. For the fact that we allow this to happen in our world is pathetic, and it all comes down to pure selfishness’, an ugly trait in which human’s possess. How can it be rational to take the life out of something because it can’t show or tell someone if they’re in agony? Over the years there have been numerous amounts of companies that have stood strong on not participating in animal cruelty; realistically it should be the only way. Humans are at fault here; before it’s too late we must realize that each living creature has a choice and should never be taken away by pure
Americans need to take the first step in teaching kids, youths, and young adults that this kind of act won’t be tolerated and there will be punishments with these kinds of acts. There is a need for stiffer penalty for committing a hate crime in our society. Animal cruelty is considered a hate crime, all though society doesn’t see this as being a hate crime if society thinks about it, it is a hate crime against the animals. So it doesn’t have to be toward a person in order for it to be considered a hate crime. In conclusion, the decision we make today about our basic freedoms will be ones we live with for a very long time.