Being kind can make you as a person feel good. When you put other people down to make yourself look good you are only lying to yourself, everyone around you really knows the truth. Seeing someone smile because of something you did or said can also make you smile. Being kind is also a very attractive quality in another person wither it is a friend, relationship, or family. Being kind should become cool, it will not only make others feel good but it will make you feel good too.
This statement is not paradoxical because we do not have to sacrifice ourselves to help others. Helping others gives people a sense of humanity and a feeling of hope. 2. According to Russell, what would the traditional moralist say about the belief that” love should be unselfish.” According to Russell, a traditional moralist would agree with this statement. A traditional moralist supports this statement and says that if you love someone what you do should be for their benefit.
He believed in universalizability which means what is right or wrong for one person in a situation is right or wrong for everyone. He feels positively towards human nature and believes that everyone is a good person so can empathise with others. Another important utilitarian was Henry Sidgwick. He felt that moral actions are not judged by their consequences but also how they benefit the welfare of people. This just means that the act is correct as long as it brings happiness to the greatest amount of people.
The biggest single factor which he feels contributes to happiness is family and other close relationships. Having good personal relationships with people who are important to us is a very significant contributor to happiness and general well being. Happy people tend to be distinguished by their rich and satisfying close relationships, rather than their greater levels of wealth. This is supported by Robert Lane’s findings. According to Spoors et al, Lane found that increased economic power did not lead to increased happiness.
Since the true path to happiness, according to Epictetus, is the attainment of virtue, we can all become happier by improving ourselves, whether morally or intellectually. Furthermore, Epictetus' philosophy of happiness would lead us to live less stressful lives if we came to worry about only that which we can control. Still, while I admire Epictetus and his philosophy, I do not believe that most of us could be happy purely through the attainment of virtue. I believe that social support and some level of material possessions are necessary for happiness; we cannot forever strive only for virtue. I do, however, believe that Epictetus had a strong point when he asserted that we should only, rationally-speaking, worry about what we can change -- what good is there in worrying about things we cannot
Aristotle also suggests happiness conforms to goodness of virtue (Kucukuysal and Beyhan, 2011). To be happy and good, one must make the right choices. Virtue is taught and learned. The ability to define happiness and decide what is virtuous is an individual choice based upon life teachings and experience. In order to make someone else happy, you must be happy with yourself.
According to the “Greatest Happiness Principle,” an action can only be right if it promotes happiness and an action is wrong if it provides the opposite of happiness. Mill’s utilitarian theory believes “all desirable things…are desirable for the pleasure inherent in themselves, or as means to the promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain.” Applying this theory to life would be an easy task, and one that many would be more than happy to live by. Enjoying a life in which there is nothing better or more attainable than pleasure, to achieve anything that would keep one away from pain and enjoy a simple life of pleasure just like as a common animal would be ideal. So using this piece of a theory, it appears that the highest good would produce the highest pleasure. Now comes the decision of what is the highest pleasure.
Happiness is a Personal Responsibility Hugh Downs once said "a happy person is not a person with certain circumstances, but rather, certain attitudes," and he couldn't be more right. Although our general mood levels and wellbeing are partially genetics and upbringing, roughly forty to fifty percent of our happiness is within our control. One psychological theory deals with set-points, average levels of happiness and well-being. As humans, we're stable with slowly moving moods and momentary changes in experienced emotions. Yet, we're most certainly not all like this- calm and collect, so why is that?
I believe that being true to yourself is something that is different for every person. Some people find it easy and have high confidence and self- esteem, whilst others worry about being judged. First of all, a definition of being true to yourself might be helpful. Being true to yourself is about accepting yourself and not worrying about what others think of you. It is ok to be different and we should embrace our individuality rather than trying to hide from it.