Do Schools Kill Creativity ?

699 Words3 Pages
I fully agree with what Sir Ken Robinson says in the aspect that schools do indeed kill creativity. He says that creativity should be treated with the same importance as literacy but I strongly feel that this is not the case with most schools. School teaches you that you have to follow a set of rules and if you don’t follow those rules you fail. Than people say that there is a stigma against failing and that failing isn’t always bad. If I go to school and fail a course, I have to take that course again and waste time, how is that not bad? If I fail an assignment, how is that good, my marks will drop. What would be a reason of failing an assignment, might it be that I was trying to be creative and do something different from what the teacher tells us do, possibly. We can’t be creative as school because we are afraid of being wrong and making mistakes, If we try something new it might end up going wrong. We are afraid of doing something wrong because we are taught it’s bad and if it’s bad, again we might fail. No teacher is going to care if you go to them and explain that you did badly in their eyes on this project/assignment because you were trying to do something new and creative. They give you a mark and they’re done. This is becomes more and more defined as you get into higher education. What university professor is going to care if you fail. They teach you what they have to teach, they get paid for it. You fail, your fault. They don’t care. If you are not prepared to be wrong you will never come up with anything original. Sir Ken Robinson says that he believes people are still born artists like Picasso had said. But the difference is that Picasso said they have to grow up to remain artist. Today Ken says that kids grow out of creativity, educated out of it. All education systems on the planet give the most importance to the least creative subjects, math and
Open Document