Discuss the nature-nurture debate in relation to Demi Lovato Key principles Nature - is the inherited or innate characteristics, features or qualities of an individual. This side of the nature-nurture debate suggests that we are a certain way because of the genes we gain from our parents. Nurture - is how the surroundings on an individual affect them, e.g. their environmental influences and conditions. This side of the nature-nurture debate suggests that we are a certain way because of the way we were bought up and our life experiences.
Nature in terms of health and social care defines as the qualities we are born with that makes us what we are. Nurture defines as how we are influenced as a child by the environment around us, including other people. Many scientists, philosophers and researches argue that individuals’ personalities and talents come from their DNA and many others argue that the majority of it is influenced by life experiences and the environment. There have been studies involving identical and fraternal twins to find out if it is the genetics (nature) or environment (nurture), which was the effective one on the case of personality development. Which side of the debate is more influential?
Personality psychologists claimed that one of the most profound challenges is to account for personality development, that’s why they put this into a study whether an individual’s behavior are caused by heredity or the environment, this study is known as the “nature” and “nurture”. First, the nature suggests that human behavior is driven mostly by biology (evolution, genetics, brain chemistry, and hormones). In contrast, the nurture suggests that behavior is driven mostly by psychosocial environment (for example, how we were raised, our peers, the situations we are in at present). Both nature and nurture contribute to who an individual is, but to better comprehend the nature versus nurture debate, we should look at the essential characteristics that make up this controversy. Humans are unique and highly-intricate creatures.
Or could it be because of the environment we are brought up into. The nature nurture debate is very much involved when discussing learning and evolutional attachment theories. The evolutionary approach explains behaviour as a result of nature whereas the behaviourist approach would state that infants are born with blank slates and everything is dependent on what they learn. I am going to evaluate Bowlby believed that humans are innately programmed with a mechanism for attachment. Bowlby’s theory is an evolutionary approach to attachment.
This assignment will describe and evaluate two theories in developmental psychology. Developmental psychology is the scientific study of changes that occur in human beings over the course of their life span. Firstly looking at Piaget’s Theory, and then followed by Kohlberg, there will be an evaluation of the similarities and differences between the two. It will provide evidence of how Piaget’s and Kohlberg’s theories both suffer from the same criticisms as they both use dilemmas with a particular criteria of a child and culture. The theory only considers a child’s beliefs not its actual behaviour.
Our environment shapes how our genes affect us though. Genes work in mysterious ways and we may not enjoy what the give to us. Good or bad, genes are what turn on nurture so our environment can shape who we are, how we behave, and possibly who we love. Ridley certainly backs his theories with much evidence and this book strongly displays his opinion of how nature brings about nurture. From the text, I gathered that Ridley wrote The Agile Gene from a biological perspective of psychology.
Maslow) • Social Learning (e.g. Bandura) • Operant conditioning (e.g. Skinner) • Behaviourist (e.g. Watson) The theorist whose theory is physical development is Arnold Gesell. His theory is that most physical skills cannot be taught but is programmed in our genetics, which means we will learn different physical skills when our body is ready to.
The debate over nature vs. nurture today focuses on what is an innate characteristic, occurring despite any outside influence, and what characteristics and traits are determined by our experiences and surroundings without a genetic cause. An example is intelligence. Is a person smart because they were born that way and genetically wired to be bright, or is it because intelligent parents raised him or her, went to quality schools, and given opportunities to learn? Conversely, if a person from a “good family” grows up to be a criminal, is it because they were hardwired to be that way, or some external influence that altered the personality traits of the individual? Traits like hair or eye color are known to be genetically linked, but behaviors, preferences and abilities are researched to see whether genetics or environment play a bigger role.
Nature versus nurture....well, as a logical compromise, I think that our behavior is strongly influenced by both (Cherry). I suppose at the core of it, nature is the basis for the manner in which someone behaves, but the environment certainly has the ability to change what is natural by incorporating a variety of factors. I agree that genes set up an individual to be more likely to behave a certain way, but the environment has the ability to alter that original state and therefore it is clearly a combination of nature and nurture, beginning with nature of course, that truly sets forth a path of behavioral patterns for any given person. Some things are not as simple as nature OR nurture, they require a combination of the two to make a substantial
Ethologist Niko Tinbergen, observed animals in their natural conditions and manipulated those conditions to learn how they respond. He proposed a theoretical framework for explaining the behavior of animals which consist of four causes. The first cause, proximal cause refers to the internal change in the animal that elicits a particular behavior. Proximal causes such as genetics, hormonal mechanism, neural mechanism and environmental conditions work to produce variation in primate behavior. Behavior is a product of the interaction between both genes and environment.