Discuss the Changing Military Needs of Roman Britain

2379 Words10 Pages
Britain was an ever changing province of the Roman Empire due to its borders changing on a frequent basis and one that was never really subjugated in its entirety like other provinces within the Empire. The result of this was that a strong military presence always had to be maintained or at least appear to be maintained especially during the first and second centuries within Britain. The province did not need a large military force to fight potential invaders because Britain was an island and it needed a military force for the local populace. This was especially relevant during the first century of its occupation as the people were never completely Romanised which is evident as we see no legions being recruited from Britain. During the 3rd Century AD Britain had been a part of the Roman Empire (for more than two hundred years )and was ‘tightly bound into the political, military, economic and social meshes that held the empire together’ (Cleary, 1989). Any problems that affected the Empire also affected Britain (as it was now a big part of the Empire) and had been for some time therefore events elsewhere could have huge impacts on the province and its people. In the ensuing years the Empire suffered. The prelude to the major military changes that were to take place in Britain during the third and fourth centuries was that of the 'third-century crisis'. The ‘third-century crises’ was a period of time in which the Roman Empire was in grave peril of becoming something of the past and cease to exist. This period officially started in 235 AD with the assassination of the Emperor Severus by his own troops. This was on the order of a General Maximus after he was proclaimed Emperor by his own troops which, who,if we are to believe Herodian, did not even want to be Emperor but to decline it
Open Document