The Definition of Independence People may say that the definition of independence is a complex word. In all truth independence is a difficult word to try to define. This is because everybody has their own assumption of what independence is. Very rarely are their two people that have the same perception of what the definition of independence is. What I believe that the definition of independence is the absolute freedom to do what you want, and to not be held back by any rules or laws of government or man, but by the rules and laws of nature and your own conscious.
According to hard determinism we are not free in the sense required for moral responsibility, and therefore, what happens cannot be affected by choices that are free in the sense. But what happens may nevertheless be caused by the decisions we chose and the choices we make. A reaction to hard determinism is that if it were true, we would have no reason to attempt to accomplish anything, to try and improve our lives because our decisions and choices would make no difference. If everything we do is pre determined then why try hard to achieve anything, if you are meant to do a certain something, it will happen, it is already determined for you, so the hard determinist would say. In the hard determinist’s judgement, this feeling of freedom is an illusion.
Everyone has the right to take risks and make decisions about their own lives, a balance should be found between service user’s participation in everyday activities and the carer’s duty of care. It should be noted that it is impossible to eliminate risk completely, however minimising and being prepared for risk by preventative action. Supporting people to live independently by taking part of their lives means accepting that there are risks that can’t be avoided but can be prepared for. 1.2) For some services, approaches to risk have been a problem because they have been concerned with avoiding potentially harmful situations for the service user and staff. People need to take risk to achieve things on their own merit, but there are people who should support them but will discourage them from taking risks because of perceived perceptions of the persons limitations.
Compatibilists believe that is the most correct thing to do. I believe that in order to have the idea of free will, you need to be free from certain constraints. Freedom is simply the idea of not being tied down physically or mentally to certain things. You have the ability to choose what you want to
Mill believed it was extremely important that an indivduals free will should not be crushed by society. Mill believed indivduality is what it is to be human and anything that takes away your indivuduality is wrong. Mill state in his book On Liberty “Whatever crushes indivduality is despotism.” Despostism is the idea of dictatorship so Mill is saying that anything that stops our indivduality for example religion is controlling us and not allowing us to be free, which is wrong. Althought we are free we must consider others, this means that we can use our freedom however we must make sure we are not spoiling the freedom of others. This is supported by Paul Kurtz who states humans have the right “to satisfy their tastes” but however they shold not “impose their values on others.” For example you may want to murder someone with your free will however if you go ahead and commit the crime you are negatively effecting others in society and this is wrong.
To allow human beings to be human, meaning the capability of humans to choose what they do and do not do and strive for whatever personal endeavors they aspire for, necessitates that the fundamental liberties be protected and held equal. These liberties are not to be influenced, changed, or tinkered with by economical, financial, or any other circumstances; all persons are entitled to these liberties regardless of status or wealth. Although the first principle is priority over the second principle and other potential conflicts, it does however still have its limits. Certain liberties not listed above, such as freedom of contract, are not protected or granted by the first principle since they are not basic liberties. The second principle of justice declares, “social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b)
No one can decide what is right or wrong except yourself. You know inside whether something is right or wrong. And you should rely on that natural inhibition more than the supernatural advice. Someone can be a good person without being
The individual's feelings and preferences are not considered. Having people make informed choices and emphasising freedom of choice helps to reduce abuse. Having a choice over even a small part of your care and life means you have control and you’re more independent. People need to know the pros and cons of all the options to decide for themselves and which one suits them best. No individual will choose something which could harm them.
Politics has to do with government and how power is used and distributed. Political freedom would be every individuals freedom to participate in government and affect changes in the system, or laws of the land. Political freedom also are the rights we have to vote for who we want as a leader and to belong to a political party. if there is no political freedom we would not be able to affect government and make changes in its control over our lifes. It is because of this freedom we we can freely criticize government laws and sign petitions to make changes.
These are based on the simple principle of ‘do as you would be done by’. Men and women should have the right, for example, to free speech because we recognise that being forced to stay silent on matters important to you is intolerable. We know that human nature is not perfect, and susceptible to behaviour which infringes the rights of others. Thus, to prevent these rights ever being infringed by individuals or governments, these need to be enshrined in a legal document. | | Any society always assumes that it’s position on matters is the most sensible, most rational, and, ultimately, best.