As a C-corporation the business, not the owner, would be held liable for any financial damages. Any accidents involving employees or customers would be the responsibility of the corporation to settle. Financially speaking incorporating is the best option because as a sole proprietorship the owner is currently paying a much higher tax rate versus the corporate tax rate. With the tax code being different for corporations there is better profit retention and security. The client also mentioned the issue of partnership and the selling of stock in order to expand the company.
If the officials who are to keep the corporations in check are run by the giant companies themselves, the concept of checks and balances can almost be discarded. If the public is informed of what is going on and reacts to the bribing events, then the big companies, who hire the lobbyists, can be forced to alter their mindset by their customers, and the special interest lobbyists can become benefactors for the general
The partners should be of like mind and have a contract that states the percentage of profits, losses, debts and day to day duties that each partner is responsible for. The contract should also state what happens if one of the partners dies or retires. In a partnership you are legally responsible for your partner's actions and can be held labile for these actions. Partnerships report their earnings, losses and deduction for the business operations, but the business itself doesn't pay taxes. The business "passes through" it's earnings or losses to its partners.
Should Mr. Jones merge Johnson Services with Smithon? What type of merger or acquisition would be best (i.e., A type, etc.)? Yes, a Type A reorganization which is a merger would be best for this acquisition. A merger can be accomplished without the use of cash. A type A merger would increase market power which would increase market share.
The contracting of the entire department or even a single task to an outside vendor translates to the turning over the management and control of the function to another company. Another reason to not outsource, is to avoid the additional possible security issues that comes with turning your information over to an outside vendor (Bucki, 2012). Risks Associated With Outsourcing When outsourcing to another company there are various risks that come with this process. One risk can come in the form of quality issues. The vendor will be function in effort to make a profit as is with all businesses.
Income taxes are assessed as personal income for each individual. A general partnership may continue as long as the partners desire to conduct business together. If one of the partners passes away their interest but not ownership is passed on to a personal representative. The personal representative will ensure any profits or surplus left from liquidation of the business are passed to the heirs of the deceased. All partners normally have an equal say in all business decisions.
All partners share in the decision making for the business. A partnership agreement is usually established in order to delegate the responsibilities of each partner such as who will make decisions for the business, how will profits and losses be shared, how much money and time each partner will contribute and even a plan in the event a partner chooses to terminate their share of the business. The main advantage of this entity is that it allows more expertise as well as financial support in order to make a business grow. The main disadvantage is that just like the sole proprietorship, the personal assets of each partner will not be spared if the company faces financial
1. Outright purchase of Smith stock a) Yes, Mr. Jones should purchase the stock of Smith outright, leaving Smithon intact as purchasing the stock of Smith co. is the simple and reasonable transaction where he can also minimize the cost of administrative matters. While issuing debt in his Johnson Services Co. to pay for the Smith Company there can arise debt issue for Johnson co if the cash flow of the company is insufficient in making such purchase to buy Smith co stock. b) Converting C corp to S corp has taxation benefit as C corp faces double taxation. Here, converting Smithon to S corp can give an advantage of having a control of limited or small number of shareholders.
CanGo is not considering the major benefit of an IPO, which is increased capital that comes from investors. If CanGo does not take this form of increased capital into account it will limit their growth. Recommendation 3 Offer an IPO CanGo should offer an IPO, allowing for increased capital. By offering an IPO CanGo will able to take a big step in the right direction of expanding their new ventures. Investors investing in an IPO are aware that it takes time to see a solid return/profit when a company is expanding into new ventures and that risks are involved.
Second, they can merge with another organization. They can acquire another company in the same industry The Company can acquire another company in the same industry provided the company has sound financial base. The Company can acquire another Company in order to eliminate the competition in the market. If the Company goes for expansion of existing manufacturing facility instead of acquisition, then all the facilities needed for manufacturing operation like plant and machinery,