Difference Between Theodore Roosevelt's Policies Toward Latin America

1830 Words8 Pages
| Foreign Policy | The differences between TR’s policies toward Latin America and Asia. And what were his motives | | Suezeth Harding | 7/12/2012 | Based on TR’s foreign policies, I research and describe the differences between the two policies toward Latin America and Asia. And explain his motives. This paper was prepared for American History 2020, taught by Professor Schuchman. | The Differences between Theodore Roosevelt’s Policies toward Latin America and Asia Theodore Roosevelt came to the presidency at the turn of the century, a very important time for the United States diplomatically. The United States moved from the old concept of isolation into a new era of expansion. Roosevelt’s presidency focused on three aspects of foreign relations: relations with European nations, Asian nations, and Latin American nations.…show more content…
According to Schuchman and Gardner (2012), they stated that the policies toward Asia were to establish naval bases to control trade routes to China, and exploiting the potential valuable market that China represented. According to Parker (2004), though Roosevelt believed in maintaining a balance of power in Asia, the region presented a difficulty not found in Europe: The title of dominant power was constantly changing hands. Before becoming president, Roosevelt initially was most concerned with Germany after friction over Samoa in 1889. His concerns shifted towards Japan after it sent a cruiser to Honolulu in response to the expulsion of a thousand Japanese illegal immigrants in 1897. His focus would then shift to Russia, which moved its military forces into Manchuria in 1901.As a result, Roosevelt was initially pleased with Japan's military victory over Russia at Port Arthur in 1904. At the same time, Roosevelt wrote to Lodge that he wanted a balance of power between these strongest Asian
Open Document