Classical Greek and Persian Societies Greece and Persia had very similar economies, yet extremely different political traits that helped both societies prosper. The Greek and Persian political systems were immensely different. Their few similarities involved the desire for greatness of their empires. Both Greece and Persia wanted to extend their empires and have the greatest political systems in the world. Another similarity was that they both had separate divisions within the empires Persia had separate satrapies, run by satraps, who were similar to governors.
The Romans were once the most influential people in the world. Although they changed the way people viewed architecture and education, their government, culture, and trade system changed, yet somewhat stayed the same. From 500 BCE to 476 CE, these three topics were areas of advancement and achievement in the Roman Empire. Before 500 BCE, the Roman Empire was just that; an empire. However, when the Roman citizens got tired of dictatorship, the government drastically changed.
Athens and Sparta were two exceptionally powerful, well-known city-states in Ancient Greece. Athens was a Direct Democracy; meaning every male citizen participates directly in government decision-making, lead by an assembly of over 6,000 male citizens and a council of 500. Sparta, on the other hand, was an oligarchy, meaning lead by a few, ruled by two kings, a council of elders, and an assembly. Although both cities had effective systems of running their government, the Spartan government was a more efficient government than Athens. Athens was in fact a democracy and though it gave more freedom to its citizens, there were just too many people to run the government in anyway but chaotic.
Both civilizations of ancient Greece and Rome established very well-ordered political practices that significantly influenced the way later governments, such as the ones in Europe and the United States, were organized. The structure of political parties, the formation of divisions within the government, and even politically used words like democracy, monarchy and tyranny all stem from the Romans and Greeks. Even though the Romans adopted several of their political principles from Greece, the number of dissimilarities between the two civilizations were vast. The Greeks and Romans both had political structures that mirrored those of a city-state. Although conversely, the very dissimilar landscape between the two swayed their political growth.
An initial aristocratic tone, though often modified, had demonstrated continued validity even in democratic centers such as Athens. Greek aristocrats could agree on the need for wise political service and devotion to political life. Some of their ideals had extended to a wider group of citizens and underwrote the intense political loyalties of the city-states. At the same time, other political trends had modified aristocratic rule, particularly through the advance of democracy. Greek political and economic control had spread widely along the eastern and northern coasts of the Mediterranean, and around the Black Sea.
Athens decided to worry more about culture. The Spartans Goverment had A War Like Attitude and best met the needs of ancient Greece. The Athen democratic government, gave the citizens in Greece more freedom. Only Some of the total population of Athens actually had voting rights and all of these citizens were upper class men who were over thirty years old. Women were given
Octavian then became the Roman Empire’s leader and brought them into a peace. There is a lot of comparison and difference between the Persian and Roman Empire. They each reached great means when it came to running their empire. They established a government and conquered many territories and places. However, there are also a lot of difference between the two empires.
citizens.” (Schultz, 2014, p 327) So many changes occurred during this era. Many defined the U.S. as an aggressive and dominating force that often confused business and politics for financial gain. A clear social ladder developed during this time and we see how the wealthy created most of the rules and standards along with certain laws and legislation. People became richer in material goods as the standards of living changed. As folks migrated from rural areas into the city, many felt a sense of culture shock because their sense of community life switched into one of autonomy and indifference.
In Greece, the population exchange weakened elite groups in the government. The arrival of refugees from Turkey also swayed the outcomes of elections because refugees represented a large portion of the votes. Greece was a constitutional monarchy until 1909, when Eleftherios Venizelos, leader of the Liberal party in Greece, took control of the government via a military coup. When refugees started arriving in the 1920s, they supported Venizelos’ government because they approved of the party’s rural land distribution. This land distribution meant that many refugees were given rural plots of land to farm on, which they liked because they were farmers when they lived in Turkey, and therefore felt more at home.
It also led to a city that was the envy of many, Mark (2011) points out that “The aristocrats lived in palaces, the less affluent in modest but attractive homes”. The harbour at Carthage was said to be the largest of the time with over 200 docks, with ornate columns forming a semi circular port covered with sculptures from the region. This trading power, supported by slave labour and backed by military force allowed Carthage to expand its empire across the North Africa region, as well as into the Iberian Peninsula, which left to contact and friction with the two other great empires of the day – Greece and Rome. The power of Rome. According to Gill “At first, Rome was