Gillham 2000 said that interview is a conversation which aims to find answers to particular questions. It involves a discussion between two or more people where one plays the role of an interviewer and the other being the interviewee. It is a qualitative method of research which generally produces rich data. It may also take the quantitative approach. He also believed that different interviews are used for different purposes.
General Guidelines for Evaluating Supportive Evidence * In determining the rigor of the science supporting a particular policy, procedure, or practice, most professional organizations have recommendations and guidelines for evaluating research study adequacy. * Greater scientific credence has often been assigned to findings based on quantitative research approaches. Randomized experimental group designs are considered “gold standard”. * Internal validity: the extent to which the research design controls for extraneous or confounding variables, variables that could support an alternative explanation for the findings. * External validity/selection bias: the number of study participants and how participants are selected, with greater external validity assigned to studies with a larger number or participants who are randomly assigned to experimental conditions.
Fundamentals of Research Methodology PSYCH/540 July 29, 2013 Dr. Kimberly Wilkins Abstract The content of this paper will discuss a field of concepts pertaining to fundamental research in methodology, and provide a discussion in the important factors concerning the psychology of science research. The contents of this paper will contain an explanation and definition of scientific method along the method steps. A discussion in this paper will cover qualitative and quantitative data, and the testing, and construction of the scientific construct theory. Fundamentals of Research Methodology The science of behavior, and the mind is known as psychology and variables factors of the effects of behavior and mind from internal and external
3 Understand techniques and criteria for monitoring the quality of assessment Internally - (Professional discussion to be based on this Essay) 3.1 Evaluate different techniques for sampling evidence of assessment, including use of technology: There are different techniques for sampling the evidence of learners work such as the vertical sampling (identical elements from different assessors and horizontal sampling which means that a specific piece of all units over the course of time is checked very carefully for validity, consistency and so forth,. This would include liaising with and interviewing assessors, reviewing their practical views on specific areas to tutoring to obtain evidence that match up with unit/element criteria, including witness statements; scrutinising their records whether they are paper based or electronically stored. I would also take the opportunity to observe good working practice and if need be consult any witnesses, for example; with regards to my work as an IV at Bradford College I would implement the above techniques for sampling evidence. With respect to this, there are a number of factors to be taken into consideration, such as the type of evidence, i.e., what format it is in, how many learners there are in the current cohort for example and which is then also dependent on the experience of the assessors and whether they are qualified or not to carry out the job effectively and efficiently and adhering to the organisation awarding body strategies, policies and procedures, all within realistic timeframes. I understand that other than the availability of a hard copy of evidence if required by the IQA staff/team, there is another more modern way of sampling using technology such as Moodle is basically a virtual delivery environment which means that candidate/learners can receive tasks and information so that they can
Qualitative research uses the information found in order to provide an understanding to the human experience and behavior ("Encyclopedia.com", 2013). Quantitative and qualitative research differs from one another in terms of what data or information that they yield and display, as well as how that information is interpreted. For example quantitative research will portrait the percentage or statistics of a matter and qualitative research will look into and portrait the life pattern or the behavior of individuals to get them into those statistics. Both can relate to the human service field as well as the scientific method, which does get used within the human service profession. Both quantitative and qualitative can be incorporated into the scientific method.
What are the similarities and differences between qualitative and quantitative research? Qualitative research is deals with collecting descriptive information that cannot be definitely measured on an exact scale, often things that are observed. Examples would be emotions or feelings, attitudes, behavior, etc. It is a research method for exploring issues and topics in an attempt to understand them better and obtain answers and in some cases find similarities. Qualitative research is used in business research, market research and even scientific research.
The three types of qualitative research are phenomenological, grounded theory, and ethnographic research. What are the differences and similarities between two of the three types of studies? Both qualitative and quantitative researches are used in many different studies, including science and the social sciences. Qualitative research is a complete and thorough explanation of events, while quantitative research generates statistical models to elucidate events. Qualitative and quantitative researches have several advantages and disadvantages, depending upon the researcher’s plan and area of focus.
They exist in all studies and can affect the measurement of study variables and the relationships among these variables. Because of this, they are of primary concern in quantitative studies because they can interfere with obtaining a clear understanding of the relational or causal dynamics within these studies (Burns & Grove, 2011). Another way to think of it is they are variables that could possibly
- .An argument that have demonstration or proof of the argument. 2. When and how do we use them? - When we attempt to persuade someone of something, by giving reasons or evidence for accepting a particular conclusion. 3.
He also said that it builds protection against bias controlling alternative explanations, and being able to generalized and replicate findings (Creswell, 2009) p.4. From the above definition, three major characteristics of quantitative are presence of variables both dependent and independent ones, hypothesis, deductive testing of theory and a set structure of final report. (a). A set structure of report could be identified in the article A as it consists of introduction, literature, hypothesis, methods, results, discussions, and implications for practice in that sequence. (b).