To begin with, it defeats the whole point of having democratically elected officials. They are mandated with the responsibility of making decisions on behalf of the citizens. Having referendums undermines this role making them powerless, almost useless. Another disadvantage of holding referendums is the extensive period of time it takes. Referendums cannot be used to make a decision of immediate necessity as it takes weeks and sometimes months to come up with a final decision.
Which also allowed the federal government the opportunity for revenue. One of the main emphases for the Hamilton and the Federalist Party was that the federal government was too over power the states. They felt that leaving too much power in the hands of states would only create a weak type of government, with very little power to act. Citizen’s rights would be protected by the legislation, court systems, and of course the Bill Of Rights; distrusting the people with the vote. The federalist created the House of Reps which was directly voted by the people.
The League’s failure to maintain relationships between potential aggressor members and communicate with them effectively was a major factor that contributed to the gradual demise of the League and a favorable argument to the ongoing debate of the Leagues inability to perform collective governance. Britain, France, Italy and Japan had the power to veto the assembly’s decisions, even if they were unanimous. This gave those found countries a distinct advantage over the rest. There were 42 original members of the League of Nations. They included Australia, the Republic of China, Columbia, Canada and Peru.
Some say a dictatorship is better because the people don’t know what is and isn’t good for them. Others might claim that a democracy isn’t necessarily the better option because there could be a lot hidden between the lines that people vote for without a second through. Both can be abused, and both can be
Mayhew makes several arguments concerning the positives and negatives of our divided government. He points out that divided government seems to have little effect on the outcome of policy making, but many critics spoke out, saying that our divided government is actually the root of governmental gridlock. Because our government is divided into different political groups, mainly republican and democratic, there are many different opinions and ideas. The two parties often fight back and forth about what they think is best for our nation, leaving them in a gridlock with both sides refusing to budge. We have this exact problem today, because our government is currently shut down.
This being the immediate cause of the treaty's failure shows that Wilson truly was to bullheaded to compromise and talk things out. Historian Bailey said that after Wilson decided that he wanted deadlock because he thought it would arouse public opinion, there was a tidal wave of public opinion and was given a second chance. However, his stiff-necked personality caused him to throw that opportunity away. “first by spurning compromise, and then by spurning the Lodge reservations.” Wilson just throws away opportunities to make both sides happy and cares for nothing more than himself. It was not the strength of the opposing forces, both liberal and conservative, but rather the stubbornness of Wilson that led to the defeat in the Treaty of Versailles.
Although the Treaty of Versailles can be said to have has the most substantial impact on the political and economic stability of Germany, the arguments against its influence suggest that other factors were more important. For example, though the treaty can be said to have caused bad feeling in the country and hyperinflation, there were a number of problems with the constitution that meant that the Government became unpopular, sparking a number of revolts. In opposition to the sentiment expressed in the question, one factor that affected political stability of the Weimar republic was the fact that it was ruled by a coalition Government. Clauses of the constitution meant that elections were held using proportional representation. As a result, a clear majority of one party over the remaining twenty-seven was never a result, and so the country, from the time the Constitution was drawn up, was governed by coalitions.
It is believed he only won the election because he looked like a great leader, rather than having the qualities of one. After his death in 1923 the corruption in the presidential cabinet became evident. He is in most opinions one of the worst presidents this country ever had. Thin slicing was a bad thing in this situation because Daughtery’s immediate assumption of Harding was not thought through and Harding ended up being a very terrible candidate. Sometimes a snap judgment is incorrect and you needed to have more education on the topic before making a decision.
Rhode Island was the only state that did not participate because they believed it was a plot to topple the government, so there was already disagreement with the intentions of the Constitution between small and large states. Two plans were in the forefront in shaping the way the government was heading, the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. The Virginia Plan would be more favored by the large states because number of representatives would be based on the population, when the New Jersey Plan had it that each state receives an equal vote. It was not until the Great Compromise where the two plans are met and settled upon with equal representation in the Senate. It also dealt with the how slaves were represented in the states.
Most people really do not know the whole Constitution and it’s entirely but if they did there would be many things they would think is constitional and do not need to be changed. Madison believed to cure the problem remove the cause or control it. We have been using this all this time so obviously it is under control. Now if we decide to make a new one it is not going to make many people happy. It’s possible it will cause many problems and possibly another recession.