Diagnoses Essay

442 WordsOct 24, 20142 Pages
Psychiatric diagnoses for children and adolescents such as Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder may do little more than attach labels to the disruptive behaviour of young people, while providing little or no insight into the root causes of disruptive, antisocial behaviour among our youth. Discuss this claim, indicating the relative strength of the evidence supporting the psychiatric position and the position held by most sociologists on this issue. Does the weight of the evidence support or discredit the value of psychiatric contributions to our understanding of youth crime? There are various theoretical perspectives for explaining delinquent and criminal behaviour. These range from biological to psychological to sociological explanations, each focusing on different causes of delinquency. The paper is asking you to evaluate the following claim "Psychiatric diagnoses for children and adolescents such as Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder may do little more than attach labels to the disruptive behaviour of young people, while providing little or no insight into the root causes of disruptive, antisocial behaviour among our youth". Here you are looking at the psychiatric position versus the sociological position which are two inherently different branches. The field of Psychiatry is all about diagnosis, treatment, and even prevention of mental disorders (using the DSM-IV-TR). While not without some merit, there is a danger in using these diagnostic tools as they often result in labeling a child. Attaching labels to disruptive behaviour has far-reaching implications and offer little by way of insight or the root causes of disruptive, antisocial behaviour. This approach is in marked contrast to the position held by sociologists who look at the environment in explaining delinquent behaviour. So your task is to discuss this claim, indicating
Open Document