Deforming Mirror of Truth

344 Words2 Pages
Nathan Huggins’ “The Deforming Mirror of Truth” goes to great lengths to explain his theory of what the deforming mirror of truth actually is. Huggins refers all the back to the founding fathers when explain this theory. The founding fathers, when framing the United States, decided not to openly address the issues of slavery or race that plagued the nation. Huggins suggested that the founding fathers may have concluded that if the atrocities were not mentioned, then they did not exist. This was just the beginning of the deforming mirror of truth. From the start, this encouraged Americans to neglect the history in slavery. Historians have gone through hoops to emphasize that “American history from even before the Revolution as an inexorable development of free institutions and the expansion of political liberty to the broadest possible public.” (Pg. 1) Huggins states that Americans see history as a “master narrative” that has no place for injustice or discrimination, even if it is overwhelmingly prevalent. This is what the deforming mirror of truth is, according to Nathan Huggins. During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950’s and 1960’s African Americans relied heavily on the court systems to gain rights. The documentary “Eyes on the Prize: Fighting Back” is mainly revolved around education. It started with Brown v. Board of Education, which declared separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. When the Arkansas state legislature opposed desegregation, after the crisis involving the Little Rock Nine, members of the school board filed suit, which lead to Cooper v. Aaron. This forced states to enforce the law, even if disagreed on. After James Meredith was rejected from the University of Mississippi, the NAACP filed a suit against the U.S. District Court. This suit stated that Meredith was qualified, but was only rejected because of the
Open Document