Families are full of love and hope but to annihilate that all is a complete act of putrid evil and hate. War gives illusional rights to these inhumane beings that these acts are a part of life which they aren’t. Natural death should be the cause of all these lives, not innocent murder. War is the reason these families blood has been spilt. After all these past events, the 1800’s wars, The Boer War, WWI, WWII and The Cold War, you’d think we’d all have learnt our lesson that war was destroying people, along with the world.
The shooting star is beautiful and unique, but it is also dying. Duffy portrays the life of the world itself as a short blast of passion and light, which all must come to end. The title reinforces the fact that any death, no matter how small, is still heroic and brave. The bravery of C-A Duffy’s Jewish woman is overwhelming, what she has to go through, devastating. Duffy takes the form of the dramatic monologue, in which she herself becomes the dead Jewish woman, speaking to us from beyond the terrible mass grave.
On the other hand, the Story of an Hour, starts from the introduction of the background of the time. And "writes down" the story from the accident of Louise's husband. It focuses on the transitional part of the heroine, yet the Joy that Kills tends to be more focusing on the conflict between the couple. Both of the film have some strong points. In my opinion, I would be more interested in the Story of an Hour because it delicately depicts the psychological transition of the heroine.
She was to be buried alive, but in turn, hung herself. The suffering of everyone around her emphasizes the tragedy of the play, by enlarging the entire outcome. If it were not for Antigone, for which the play is named, all of the deaths might not have occurred. Her sudden
However, the authors use different writing styles that demonstrate the different outlook on the characters, thus creating the illusion that Poe's character in "A cask Of Amontialldo" is crazier then Faulkener's character in a "Rose For Emily." The characters take extreme measurements to protect their pride, even if it means murder. The authors both like to use a lot of foreshadowing throughout the story that lets the reader know death is coming. Faulkner uses a out of order timeline to tell his story, and Poe uses hints throughout his story. Faulkner has death in the readers mind by starting out with "When Miss Emily Grierson died, our whole town went to her funeral," (Faulkner) already giving the death theme before the reader knows anything.
Every second of the day someone in the world dies. Death happens to us all whether we choose it or not, and in the end it is ultimately inevitable. It can occur directly or indirectly, on purpose or accidentally but regardless it happens to everyone in the end. A controversial issue known as Euthanasia is an example of death by means of a direct action. Death by means of a direct action is occurs when and individual dies as a result of another’s actions.
Commentary on Queen Extract - Act 4 Scene 7 This short extract from Act 4 Scene 7 of the play gives a deep visual description of the death of Ophelia as described by the Queen. The description is vital to the closure of the scene because it sets a melancholic tone inciting deep sadness into Laertes and bringing the audience to sympathize with him on two levels: that of a brother who has tragically lost his sister and that of a son who has lost his father to a gruesome murder. For this reason the audience is able to discern Laertes’ role as a parallel avenger to Fortinbras as well as being able to see the marked difference between Laertes’ approach to revenge and that of Hamlet’s approach. The way by which the Queen delivers the tragic news is also important to note, it seems that the description has been embellished and romanticized in order for the Queen to acquit herself from any blame which could possibly be placed on her for Ophelia’s death. As with many of the play’s characters the Queen uses her embellished and romanticized language to achieve a level of ambiguity surrounding Ophelia’s death leading the audience to ask many questions which go unanswered.
Therefore, Golding explores the fragility of order in a society under stress. He also expresses this through constantly referring to the conch as fragile such as in the line ‘the fragile white conch’, emphasizing that civility can be lost any moment. This is also shown when the conch smashes to pieces, now representing broken civility and chaos. At this point, Piggy also dies. ‘Piggy was dead and the conch smashed to powder’ enforces that Piggy represented the need for science and intellectual endeavour in society so the break of both of these symbols at the same time shows a sudden corruption of civilisation.
Her poems on death, though, almost go beyond time. Dickinson’s two poems, “Because I could not stop for Death-“and “I heard a Fly buzz-when I died-”, are both about one of mankind’s biggest fears, death. The thought of death terrifies us. It is almost as if death is lurking right around the corner to jump out and get you like Michael Myers does in the movie Halloween. It is a negative event in life and something to be dreaded, mainly because it is an unknown.
He’s had enough misery, thanks to you”’ (37). Immediately, Truus is connected to Anton’s family’s deaths. However, the environment, which has a sliver of light in a sea of darkness, reflects the complexity of her actions, which are not entirely dark either. Truus herself attempts to justify the assassination in the name of light: “‘Hate is the darkness, that’s no good. And yet we’ve got to hate Fascists, and that’s considered perfectly all right.