However, this fails as Bagsley enjoys being able to make Ishmael afraid and continues to tease him. Ishmael becomes very unhappy and deeply pessimistic. Ishmael’s hatred of Bagsley leads him to desire revenge. This causes him to a plan to humiliate Bagsley in front of the whole school and Bagsley’s parents during his participation of the prayers of petition. The author draws parallels with Captain Ahab who was so consumed by revenge that he sacrifices his own life and all the sailors for whom he is responsible.
You can take my word for it’’ has a huge impact on regarding towards Torrez personality. This ending can be represented in two different ways the first one and the most accurate one is that Torrez did all of that just to leave the narrator living on terror and kill him sooner or later which just proves how sadist and psychopath he is. He could also be proving the fact, that he knew the narrator wasn’t going to be brave enough to kill him, to his peers. The whole plot of the story changes by the ending of the story, Torrez was planning everything ever since the beginning and he just wanted to prove to him that he is better than the rest. On the other hand the ending can also represent as in that Torrez did have a heart but had to do what his job demands to.
He believes society has grown custom to useless things and we don’t need. He states that although you might think you own your belongings, your belongings own you because if something were to happen to your things you would be devastated, so Tyler wants to put an end to all of that. He is trying to make everyone re envision their way of life. He wants to start anew and the only way to reach that goal was to reset everyone’s credit to zero by destroying several buildings of importance. He gained many followers by manipulation and helped them all hit rock bottom, and by doing so they are able to destroy their false self and over, because only when you have reached an all time low you will not have anywhere else to go but up, his belief was once you hit bottom that when you can truly achieve perfection.
In the story point of view Victor also betrayed God. Victor’s way of grieving his mother’s death is to get obsessed with death and to bring something dead, or rather, a compilation of many dead something’s, back to life. He caught up so much in his ideas and his plans that he forgot about God and the way things should be created so he decided to challenge himself and bring back to life
Grendel’s “defiance of right” earns him a warrant for the hero named Beowulf to dispose of him and what he represents (Beo. line 144), and his “one against all” philosophy runs against the grain of the ideals that all civilized society is built upon (Beo. line 145). Even after Grendel is “fatally hurt” when Beowulf tears “the whole of Grendel’s shoulder and arm” off (Beo. line 819, Beo.
Because he kept going back and forth about killing him, and he kept on stating reasons why he should and shouldn’t kill him. I thought that he would kill him because there we’re more and better reasons why he should then shouldn’t. The main thing that the story left me with is that did the barber kill Torres or Torres kills the barber. Because I would think that if Torres found out that the barber was his enemy (a rebel) he would kill him sooner or later. And did Torres ever trust the barber after, or were they always going to be enemies.
And he kills an old man for no other reason than because his eye makes “his blood run cold”. The story starts out erratic, “True!—nervous—very, very dreadfully nervous I had been and am; but why will you say that I am mad?”(228). The narrator cannot even speak in complete sentences, or even complete thoughts here and that sends up a red flag that something might be off in his head. He claims his madness is not really madness; it is just his sharpened senses. “The disease had sharpened my senses—not destroyed—not dulled them.
He stopped thinking about the feelings and opinions of people that respect him and instead began selfishly thinking about only himself. Without any morals to guide him he soon began to think of only the immediate problems. His lack of planning eventually leads to his frantic behavior and loss of self-control. He eventually just begins to kill anyone who opposes him to solve problems that he could have easily avoided if he would stop and think. Macbeth’s actions traveled along a line going from honor and respect to the killing of women, children, and his best friends.
The reporter wants the reader to sympathise for the double killer Robert Harris. He says “gurgled and gasped for air as the cyanide gas choked the life from him” The reporter has used strong emotive language to emphasize the pain harris went through. In the article the reporter clearly wants to make the reader feel like Harris was killed in the worst way possible. The writer states “If you asked me i’d say that was not a clean humane way to die “ this makes the reader feel like it was a horrible way to die and he wouldn’t report on it again. In the article I see a killer die the reporter wanted us to be in favour of Harris when he wrote “We had heard he had broken down and cried to a guard shortly before he was tied to the chair with leather straps” This makes the reader feel as if Harris was remorseful towards the victims families.
The reason about this is because before doing something Hamlet wants to makes sure that he is right and not judging his uncle and mother in the wrong way. After that he judges his mother and decides to kill Polonius in a desperate situation. This change occurs because he was not conscious about himself, taking into account that minutes ago he discovered the truth about his father’s murder. Finally he takes revenge and kills the king. This change occurred because at this point