Dd101 Tma04 Essay

1394 Words6 Pages
Compare and contrast the approaches of Cohen and Hall et al. to the role of the media in relation to social disorder. Disorder is explained as disorderly conduct or a public disturbance, maybe making a nuisance of yourself in public, these can all be portrayed in a bad way and can get you into trouble with the police or other authorities. It is also known as being anti-social, where someone is being antagonistic, hostile or unfriendly towards others. Ideas of what is orderly and disorderly are also imagined and invoked by different communities in different ways. These ways of imagining order and disorder are heavily mediated through the mass media. (Staples et al., 2009) While there seems to have always been disorderly behaviour, it has a history. Forms of social order that are acceptable to some people may be seen as unequal and unjust to others, and thus prompt disorder as a form of resistance or opposition. Rather than addressing issues of inequality and injustice, people in positions of power may focus on governing forms of disorder. A moral panic is an emerging moral crisis and a moral danger. (‘The making of order and disorder’, 2009, Track 1) When talking about disorder Stanley Cohen (1973) suggests that the media depiction of anti-social behaviour helps to construct folk devils. In Cohen’s original study they were the ‘mods’ and ‘rockers’, members of two youth cultures who sometimes fought each other and attacked seaside shops in mid 1960s Britain. When the media wrote about the gangs on motorbikes and scooters coming down to the seaside, they exaggerated and amplified how they had come down to deliberately cause trouble by attacking the locals and the visitors. Many would say that it is just the tabloid newspapers way of reporting. The role of the media is the central focus of his work. (DD101, Online Activity 25) Stuart Hall and his co-authors
Open Document