Case Citation: Kentucky. v.King, 563 U.S. (2011) Parties: Kentucky, Petitioner Hollis King, Respondent Facts: In Lexington, Kentucky, police officers entered an apartment building. They were in search of a suspect who had sold cocaine to an undercover informant. After a chase, police lost the suspect. They came to an apartment building where they smelled marijuana coming from one of the doors.
Terrance Taylor ADJ 4 Oliver Thompson 4-2-11 Terrancetaylor32@yahoo.com 951-316-2072 Case Law Oliver Thompson was arrested for 459 pc- Burglary of an inhabited dwelling, 12964 Bordeaux Court, Moreno Valley, CA. He was arrested March 27, 2011, and his bail was set at 50,000. Upon his arrest, Oliver was searched and a hand gun with altered numbers, and a silencer was found on him. 459 pc is burglary, which is entering a structure with the intent to commit a felony once inside. All though burglary is referred to as “breaking and entering,” prosecutors can charge you with this offense even if there is no forced entry of the structure.
Case Law Paper Last Friday, Thompson was arrested on reasonable suspicion for burglary of an inhabited dwelling, 459 PC. Reasonable suspicion was established in 1968 by the Terry v Ohio case. In the Terry v Ohio case an officer had observed 3 men “casing” a store. When the officer asked their name they had mumbled a response. The officer then spun Terry around while patting him down and found a weapon.
It has been stated, however, that the core of all the meanings of probable cause is a valid reason for belief of guilt, and that the notion of guilt must be individualized with regards to the person to be searched or seized. In this particular case, one or all three of the people in the car knew that the drugs were in the car and exercised dominion over them (Edwards, 1995). Thus, a officer could come to the conclusion that there was probable cause to believe Pringle committed the crime of possession of cocaine, either by himself or jointly. Conclusion The existence of probable cause is based on certain facts. The Supreme Court has explained in many cases, on what reasonable interruptions may be taken from all of the facts and circumstances known in the case, it is perhaps difficult to answer any hypothetical question involving multiple parties very precisely (Waksman, 2010).
Hudson v. Michigan Background facts: Police obtained a warrant authorizing a search for drugs and firearms at the home of petitioner Booker Hudson. They discovered both. Large quantities of drugs were found, including cocaine rocks in Hudson’s pocket. A loaned gun was lodged between the cushion and armrest of the chair in which he was sitting. Hudson was charged under Michigan law with unlawful drug and firearm possession.
Actor secret Michael Finch moved, an East Coast transplant with a college degree and an appetite for the fast lane. On April 10, 1990, a neighbor noticed a foul odor coming from Finchs apartment and called police. a dead adult male on a bed completely covered with a green blanket. A pillow had been placed on top of the mans face beneath the blanket. He had been stabbed twice in the chest and his throat had been slit.
Francois was accused of assaulting a girl in his bedroom on the second floor of his home. That same afternoon, the police returned to 99 Fulton Street to talk with Kendall Francois about this most recent attack. They asked him to come into the police department to discuss the report. He agreed and was taken to headquarters. Over the next few hours, Francois eventually made many admissions regarding the disappearance of the women.
Two AID investigators soon arrived and DiLacqua told them the story he had prepared, with Brady and the two officers standing by. (7) DiLacqua's testimony is another false report. After trying to retrieve some items Brady had forgotten at the bar (including his service revolver), DiLacqua ordered Yatcilla to drive Brady home--something, one hopes, the Philadelphia police would do for any driver whose car was disabled in an
Insidious Disease: Police Brutality Knock, Knock. The police are going door to door, looking for a rape suspect. They knock on the door next to yours: a quiet, legal African American immigrant’s home. He answers, and reaches into his jacket to retrieve his wallet to show his identification to the officers. At the moment, the four policemen open fire forty-one times on the man, and he drops dead.
In order to establish a false arrest claim, the person detained must prove that the arrest is unlawful and such unlawful arrest resulted in injury. An arrest is unlawful when the police officers in question did not have probable cause to make the arrest. An arresting officer who fails to take the arrested person before a court or magistrate within a reasonable time or without unnecessary delay is guilty of false imprisonment. Similarly, an officer who arrests a person without a warrant is liable for false imprisonment by detaining the prisoner an unreasonable time. Generally, false arrest is one of several means of committing false imprisonment.