This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. George Washington and Thomas R. Frazier (author of a newspaper excerpt) were both federalists and supporters of the new Constitution. George believed they had errors to correct, meaning he thought that the new Constitution would fix the problems that the Articles of Confederation caused. Thomas believed they were in need of having an efficient federal government. Both federalists believed the new Constitution would help with providing protection, the general welfare of the people and enforcing the laws.
A fundamental difference in the ideas of the Americans sprang from their views in regard to National and State rights. Some of them regarded the State as the ultimate unit. Others insisted that the Nation was sovereign. These two conflicting views run through American history down to the Civil War, and even in Washington’s time they existed in outline. Washington himself was a Federalist, believing that the Federation of the former Colonies should be made as compact and strongly knit as possible.
Name U.S History Instructors name 10/14/14 Federalist Vs Anti-federalist From 1787-1790 the development of the American Constitution was a battle between two opposing political philosophies. America’s best political minds gathered in Philadelphia and other cities in the Northeast in order to find common ground in a governmental structure. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had both some political thoughts that agreed as well as some political thoughts that disagreed. However, both parties would compromise and ultimately come together. The Federalist Party, led by James Madison, was in favor of the newly formed Constitution.
Two competing political philosophies have always existed throughout the United States’ relatively short history: one seeking to increase the power of the central government, and one seeking to decrease it. During the 1800s, these two conflicting philosophies emerged in confrontations between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Thomas Jefferson promoted escalating the common man’s role in government. Alexander Hamilton, however, advocated the significance of a sturdy central government in leading the country forward. Both Thomas Jefferson’s and Andrew Hamilton’s beliefs and views helped to shape the United States into the country it is today.
Articles of Confederation Vs. The US Constitution The Articles of Confederation The Articles of Confederation were written to give the nation some form of centralized government and leadership, and were written by a committee of the Second Continental Congress headed by John Dickenson. The Articles originally were proposed with a strong central government with control over the west, equal representation for the states, and the power to levy taxes, but because of their experience with Great Britain the States feared a powerful central government. Due to this fear the committee made several changes to the Articles and then they sent them to all the states for ratification in November of 1777. The Continental Congress was careful to give the states as much independence as possible.
The creation of the political parties first emerged during the 1790s. Two of the founding fathers had different views on how the country should be governed. Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the Federalists, while Thomas Jefferson was the leader of the Anti-Federalist also known as the Republicans. Both of their political differences had a great impact on helping develop important aspects of the country. Alexander Hamilton was one of the founding fathers that contributed a lot to the creation of the country.
He believed in “Life, Liberty, and Property.” One of the main framers that John Locke influenced majorly was a classical liberal and that was Thomas Jefferson. (Stephenson 119) Jefferson once states, “Our liberty depends upon the freedom of the press.” He played a big role in the creation of the Bill of Rights, which are all about equality and being liberal. He was the one who contacted Madison and told him to ratify the constitution because it lacked a bill of rights and the failure to provide for rotation in office. James Madison was the father of the Constitution and drafted the Bill Of Rights, which is all about equality. To make the people feel equally powered with the government and Madison was a liberal.
He believed that the Constitution gave the federal government opportunities to do whatever was “necessary and proper” as in a national bank. Jefferson on the other hand was an anti-federalist. He believed in a “strict” interpretation of the Constitution. If the Constitution didn’t give abstract power on something, it was up
The constitution contains our unalienable rights that protects us from government. The bill of rights spell out for every american what they can do within the realm of their freedom. Our constitution is our structure. The three branches of government and the checks and balances are all still fundamental in the running of america.But there are outdated sections of it that need to be reguvinated, that need to be discussed for the betterment of our government.It need to declare issues like heathcare and an economic plan so that the country can have a clear path to walk through. It seems like america is too proud to let go of its constitution, it has become a historical trophy for our government that sits and collects dust.We must re-draft the constitution,keeping some fundamental sections but reforming parts that no longer are important, and to add sections that have become a part of america.The action of even questioning the relevance of the constitution, shows the old and non functional nature of the constitution.
# 1– The American vs. French Revolution The leaders of both the American and French Revolutions declared that their goal was to create a new political system based on the principles of liberty and equality. However, the interpretation of those ideas by the American Founding Fathers turned out to be distinctly different from that of the French revolutionaries. How did those different interpretations of the concepts of liberty and equality affect the outcomes and the legacies of both revolutions? Analyze, compare, and contrast “Revolutionary movements require some unifying body of ideas, a common vocabulary of hope and protest, something, in short, like a common ‘revolutionary psychology’.” This quote by George Rude’, a French Revolution historian, applies to both the French and American revolutions from the 18th century. Both wars have similar qualities, as they were focused around liberty and equality.