Haynes Webster 1. What was the fundamental difference between Hayne’s and Webster’s interpretations of the Constitution? The fundamental difference between Hayne’s and Webster’s interpretations of the Constitution was that Haynes believed that the states should have the right to set aside certain federal laws if they wished. Webster believed that states must listen to the federal government 2. Explain the relationship between Hayne’s argument and the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions of 1798.
The Legislative Branch consists of the Senate and House of Representatives. Checks and balances create independence amongst the Judicial, Executive, and Legislative branches of the U.S. government. Examples of checks and balances include the Presidential veto of a Congressional bill, the Congressional impeachment of the President, or the Judicial ruling of Congressional laws that violate the U.S. Constitution. Each branch has its own actions and rules of conduct, giving them the freedom to legally operate without limitation from another branch. Each part of the U.S. government is limited in their power as given by the Constitution.
The Supreme Court presides on cases that conflict with the Constitutional laws and with treaties of foreign affairs. The framers of the US Constitution were determined to separate the powers of the federal government into three branches: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial. The Supreme Court is in the Judicial Branch of government. Once the Supreme Court renders a decision, all other courts in the country follow the precedent set by that decision (Dautrich and Yalof 277). This precedent is also known as Stare
s. What is the title of the paragraph where George is annotated? t. What Code section is related to the George case? u. A Revenue Ruling cites the George case. What is the citation and title?
Did the Laws of the US allow the courts to grant Marbury such a writ? 3. If they did, could the Supreme Court issue such a writ • For the first question, Marshall ruled that Marbury had been properly appointed in accordance with procedures established by law, and that he therefore had a right to the writ. Because Marbury had a legal right to his commission, the law must afford him a remedy. The Chief Justice went on to say that it was the particular responsibility of the courts to protect the rights of individuals even against the president of the US.
To study how we got our constitution and learn more about the government • identify weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation What was the Articles of Confederation? First constitution of the United States of America and specified how the national government was to operate Why did it fail? The national government had no power And the states could do whatever they wanted B. Students will analyze the United States Constitution in order to determine the basic principles of democracy • analyze the Preamble of the Constitution What is the Preamble? The intro to the constitution Identify the goals listed in the Preamble of the Constitution.
Chapter 2 Due Class #4 1. What did Marbury v Madison establish? The doctrine of judicial review was not legally established, however, until 1803, when the United States Supreme Court rendered its decision in Marbury v. Madison.1In that case, the Supreme Court stated, “It is emphatically the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is. . .
The following will examine the United States Supreme Court, thus making the answer to that question apparent. Purpose The highest court in the United States of America has one purpose when it comes to judicial decisions.
GUIDED READING As you read, consider the following questions: • Why is the author so concerned with the distribution of power between the parts of government? • What "check and balances" does the author propose to keep the three powers of the government separate and distinct? T o the People of the State of New York: TO WHAT expedient, then, shall we
| c. | d. | e. | f. | g. | h. | i. | PART TWO: images to illustrate powers given to the Supreme Court by the Constitution: | POWER:Disallow executive orders or Congressional laws if it declares them to be unconstitutional | POWER:Rule on cases that involve the Constitution | POWER:Rule on cases that involve arguments between two or more states | IMAGE: | IMAGE: | IMAGE: