They did not follow the proper procedures for the offense when terminating some employees. Management also disregarded the Merit Rule for dismissal supported by just cause. Before DelDOT management took the actions that they did with all employees involved, they should have consulted with their human resources department. Human resources should have told the managers the proper way to proceed with the disciplinary actions to all involved. They could have explained to the managers that immediate termination is not the proper form of discipline for the offenses mentioned.
Attorneys for the family against the machine manufacturer (AECL) The Therac-25 design eliminated many of the hardware safety features that been built into previous designs, assuming the software was functioning correctly and eliminated the need for safety features. Prior machines had been known to have software issues that would frequently shut down the machine. No overdoses were given because the hardware intervened. These features were eliminated in the Therac-25, an obvious example of poor judgment on the part of the manufacturer. The manufacturer of the machine responded irresponsibly in investigating incidents and in failing to make changes immediately after the very first incident.
This may have resulted from turning a heavy patient un assisted from other staff or equipment not available. The company could be prosecuted for failing to comply with regulations. i.e. a breach of Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and Manual Handling Regulations. The company would also be found liable, as they had not taken steps to protect the safety of an employee.
We believe that both the employee and the employer were unethical in this case because it illustrates a degree of moral intensity. The employee had a due diligence to the employer and should have brought his concerns to higher management instead of blogging it on a low profile under a false name. The employer had a due diligence to the employee and should have expressed their concern to the employee. The employer could of asked the employee if he could have deleted the blog or edit it so that the name of the employer was not mentioned. The degree of harm that could have happened to the company was not justified because when a search was made in an Internet search and the blog was not easily accessible in the public domain and this does not give the employer the just cause for termination of the employee.
Annie made a very poor decision by not listening to grace and letting her go by herself and it led to a bad consequence of grace falling off the cliff as she would have been safer with Annie. Another poor decision is that after the incident she went straight home and the bad consequence was that she left grace and grace was all along and hurt as she could have helped her and grace would have been
Finally Alcetis burst into the room and said, "I will die for you. I could not go on living if you were to die." Admetus did not want her to die for him, but the god's had heard her and there was nothing they could do. Everyday Admetus got stronger as Alcestis go weaker. Finally Alcestis died.
The encounter becomes a heated argument as Farhad refuses to pay for a door not fixed while Daniel explains that he only fixes locks, not doors. The ultimate result being the unfixed lock leaves the shop exposed to thieves who ransack the place leaving Farhad without an income source for his family. Farhad decides the only justice is to gun down Ruiz for the loss and believes he caused by not fixing the door. “Because of the communication display of Farhad toward Daniel, Farhad did not effectively accomplish what he wanted (Haggis, 2004).” The matter could have been easily handled effectively if Daniel maybe could have used nonverbal communication by
This saves the company from training for product knowledge. People do not shop Best Buy for customer service. This is the worst part about the company. The staff can tell you as much as they know about the products and prices but not one employee will go out of their way to make a sale, informs a customer, or ensure any customer service. From a standpoint of a shopper I would evaluate the store as a confusing mess that seemed like a sale every time one shops.
But now that all this has happened I feel pretty bad about what happened because I did not report the failing staircase. I made a very bad and unethical decision because I let my personal emotions of hate build up instead of discussing with my supervisor the problem I had and someone got badly hurt because of it. As workers in a place of business we all of have the responsibility to report any safety violations or concerns to the proper people so they can get taken care of it no matter what personal feelings we have toward the people that this concern would directly affect. By everyone doing their part our places of business are safer and better to work in. Ethical decisions are not just in the way of safety they
I think that the error in decision making came because the CEO didn't know the terrible status of the company. I think that he thought he was alright to do what he did financially, even though spending that kind of money just to upgrade your office is absolutely ridiculous. The only thing that could've prevented that situation is for the CEO to have some common sense about how to spend your money or even know the company's standing. 3. I think that both CEO's should've let their employees know the status of what was going on, because it seemed that they had no idea of the things that were occurring.