Tevin Hutchinson 11/10/2012 English 102 Technology plays a huge role in our everyday life. I do believe that technology has made our lives easier, but it also has made us more dependent on the technology itself. When using the internet for a dictionary you could easily get distracted. Anyone can put anything on the internet, so what you find might not be accurate. Most people find that looking things up on the internet is distracting because you are already on the web so why not check YouTube for a funny video, or update your status on the social network.
As for D, this is not for guarantee. 2-21: A. This is the definition of PCAOB. As for the text, it said that it is a quasi-government al regulatory agency overseen by the SEC in order to protect investors and the public interest by promoting informative, accurate, and independent audit reports. For B, accounting standard is not correct.
MGT2 Task 3 Part A. Addendum to Xemba Translations’ Telecommuter Expansion Project Risk Assessment Matrix Description of Risk | Impact | Likelihood of Occurrence(L,M,H) | Degree of Impact(L,M,H) | Initial Action to Take if Event Occurs | Team Member Responsible | Strategies for Prevention and Mitigation | | Customer data becomes public, or altered because of lax in security on telecommuters computers | “The FTC Act provides penalties monetary, as well as, criminal for violations of consumer data privacy,” (Jolly, 2013). Consumers may also elect to pursue civil action. | L | H | Deny further access to the company database from any external sources until measures are taken to assure this does not happen again. | Hugh, Malinda | Make sure there is a privacy policy in place and that employees are aware of it and the consequences of violations. Secure the Telecommuters computers before they are distributed.
One of the flaws that the opposition notices is that in way shield laws afford extra privileges to journalists and that no citizen should be able to ignore a court ordered subpoena. Simply put, journalist would be placed above the law. Justice Department Official John Ashcroft stated that “reporters today are driven by their editors to deliver tersely written “scoops” usually whispered to them by individuals with political or self-serving agendas who refuse to be identified” and that they “should ultimately be held accountable for acting recklessly and irresponsibly. Allowing journalist this privilege would only further allow them you be able to utilize non-credible sources. Opponents also cite problems with defining who is considered a journalist or news gatherer and who is not.
These statements constitute a threat because they demonstrate that the company was making attempts to influence employees regarding the union vote by making viable threats regarding existing benefit packages. This is an important consideration to make because it represents a means by which the organization sought to overcome the influence of the union by attempting to dissuade employees from voting one way regarding the vote. 2. Do the employer statements constitute an unlawful promise of benefits in violation of Section 8(a) (1) or the act? Why or why not?
The federal government can also control exchange in a situation when it has an effect on interstate progress of supplies and provisions and may strike down state proceedings which are obstacles to such movements (2012). Is The Confusion Statue Constitutional? Discuss Your Legal Reasoning Under the meaning of Article III, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution, the lawsuit stresses a “case of controversy.” Although states have the authority to set their own statues, some of them can cause distress and have to be evaluated by advanced courts. The state of Confusion is using the undemanding fact that the trucks have to drive through their state and are advancing from them economically. They are not requiring the B-type hitch to guard the roadways and are exclusively requiring the hitch to generate additional profits.
For a monopoly to be considered to breach antitrust laws found within the Sherman Act a set of criteria need to be met. First, the individual must be in control of a monopoly and not a perceived monopoly.The next stepping stone to breaking the antitrust laws found within Section 2 of the Sherman Act directly concerns intent. ( Antitrust,488) If it is Ashwin Selvarajan the intent of an individual to gain monopolistic control and then unleash the forces of their monopolistic control on the market, erasing many levels of competition within their business sector, then this would be considered a breach of the Sherman Act. Saul can argue Murray, by trying to break the past business practice and also by acquiring other competition is showing intent to gain monopolistic attitude. There are a few theories which support Murray Firstly, A monopoly can develop from the sale of a superior product with respect to the company’s competitors.
The Patriot act defines specific obligations for all financial institutions to report inconsistent cash activities. Online banking has led to a deeper concern regarding the securitization of transactions. Some may say that this act is an intrusion into personal liberties; however, technology and the unethical use of such, has changed the landscape. Background checks and formal validation procedures are now part of the financial culture to ensure personal protections. Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1970 The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) was enacted to “protect consumers from the disclosure of inaccurate and arbitrary personal information held by consumer reporting agencies” (Consumer Privacy, 2001, ¶1).
A person that doesn’t promise,,has to follow certain rules to disclaim the warranty of merchantability. A seller’s promise of fit goods, can also be enforced by members of the buyers household. In a few states it, warranty protects the family, and whoever uses, get injured because of the breach. In the past “ privity of contract meant you could only sue the seller, now you can sue retailers, wholesalers, and manufacturers if goods are not fit. Contract law promotes commerce, by guaranteeing that the law protects them.
Google is by far the worst example of an information supplier, in that, a search on Google can inundate the reader with an outlandish list of results. The majority of these results are often not what most educators would consider scholarly work, but instead opinion and conjecture. Wikipedia on the other hand, advertises itself as an encyclopedia type service. While their information is rather extensive and referenced for the reader, its basic flaw is that it is collaborative software. It allows its contributors to freely edit the content that is broadcast through the internet.