Which of the following is not characteristic of an executive summary? A. Avoids technical jargon. B. Should be limited to one page. C. Clearly summarizes major findings.
8. Explain briefly the role of emotion in non-cognitivist ethics. Non-Cognitivism ignores the external causes of
Question 5: Three- and Four-Dimensionalism are not genuinely distinct accounts of persistence: they are equivalent. Discuss with reference to two arguments to Miller’s “The Metaphysical Equivalence of Three- and Four-dimensionalism”. I offer an argument that supports Miller in the claim that three- and four-dimensionalism are metaphysically equivalent, however in regard to the notion of equal simplicity, I argue against Miller that it gives no significant and contributing answer to the true metaphysical equivalence between 3D and 4D. This paper will focus on two arguments from Miller’s “The Metaphysical Equivalence of Three- and Four-Dimensionalism”: that three- and four-dimensionalism are equally explanatory in consideration of the issues that arise from the theory of special relativity, and that they are equally simple. I will also consider Balashov and Hales & Johnson’s claim that four-dimensionalism (hereafter 4D) better explains a world based on special relativity (hereafter SR) than three-dimensionalism (hereafter 3D).
Third Way = 1. Necessary beings are caused. 2. Not every being can be necessary. 3.
The above will be demonstrated by answering the following questions:- Did the author(s) answer all of the research questions (2 or more examples how)- Evaluating the study design and giving 3 examples of how it was designed well - Evaluating the validity and reliability of measures – do they seem appropriate? (2 reasons why/why not) | Same as exemplary except:- Only one example of how author(s) answered the research questions- Only 1 or 2 examples of how it the study was well designed- Only 1 reason in evaluating the validity and reliability | Same as competent except:- No clear example of how author(s) answered the research questions- No clear examples of how it the study was well designed- No evaluation the validity and reliability | Same as emerging except:- No example of how author(s) answered the research questions- No examples of how it the study was well designed
(12marks) Explain why you chose this hypothesis or argument or assertion or issue or problem for investigation. (8marks) Justify one or more method(s) used to collect reliable data for your
Dolar demonstrates that the voice constitutes a difference or gap. By nature it exists in between the two entities of body and speech. The voice is that which connects the two entities without actually belonging to either of them. There are two paradoxical tendencies that exist in the presence of the object voice. The first is the proclivity to ignore the physicality of the voice in order to extract its significance or the meaning of its words.
Discusses alternative courses of action that reasonably might be taken. Alternatives No alternative courses of action considered. Actions and No action proposed or Consequences proposes infeasible action(s). No positive and negative consequences are identified. Reasonable action(s) proposed.
The means-end condition which means the bad effect must not be the means by which one achieves the good effect. 3. The right-intention condition which means the intention must be the achieving of only the good effect, with the bad effect being only an unintended side effect. 4. The proportionality condition which means the good effect must be at least equivalent in importance of the bad effect.
Part I: Two Types of Evidence 1. Quantitative Evidence: Any support for your argument that can be expressed as a number (e.g., statistics, calculations). 2. Qualitative Evidence: Any support for your argument that cannot be quantified (e.g. historical narrative, policies, logical explanation that appeals to common sense, shared knowledge, beliefs and values between the reader and the writer) Discussion Questions: 1.