Cultural Variations in Attachment

584 Words3 Pages
Cultural variations in attachment Culture is the set of shared attitudes, values, goals and practises that characterise an institution, organisation or group.  Individualistic culture - sees individuals and independence important (Western – UK, USA)  Collectivist culture - sees the group/community as important, things are shared, aspire to be interdependent (Japan, Israel) If we judge another If we judge another culture using the values and practices of our own culture this is ethnocentrism. Cross Cultural Similarities (Support’s Bowlby’s view that attachment is universal)  Ainsworth (1967)  Observed infants attachment behaviour in Uganda  Findings: infants used mothers as a secure base for exploration and mothers of securely attached infants showed greater sensitivity towards their infants than those who were insecurely attached  Tronik et al (1992)  African tribe  Infants lived in extended family groups, were looked after and even breastfed by different women but usually slept with their own mother. Despite such differences in child-rearing practices the infants at 6 months, still showed one primary attachment  Fox (1977)  Studied infants on Israeli kibbutzim, who spent most of their time being cared for in a communal childrens home by metaplot (nurses, 1 nurse = metapelet)  Attachment was tested in the SS with either metapelet or mother.  Findings: Infant appeared equally attached to both caregivers except in terms of reunion behaviour where they showed greater attachment to their mother. This suggested that the mother was the primary attachment figure despite the shared care. Cross Cultural Differences (Challenging Bowlby’s view that attachment is universal)  Grossman & Grossman (1991)  Conducted a longitudinal study following 49 German families over a period of time.  Findings: More infants were insecurely
Open Document