To what extent is feminism a single doctrine? In many ways, feminism can be seen to be a single doctrine in that all feminists have some similarities in their beliefs. Nevertheless, feminism can be seen to be characterised by a number of significant ideological divisions. However, until the 1960s feminism was viewed as a sub-set of liberalism and socialism rather than an ideology. It is certain that feminism is a cross-cutting ideology, encompassing the three broad traditions of liberal traditions, socialist feminism and radical feminism, but whether it is today a single doctrine or still simply a sub-set of others can be greatly debated.
Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory by Judith Butler Judith Butler argues that gender identity is a performative achievement is constrained by social sanction and taboo. She defined performative as an act by the very fact of it happening, such as the act of promising by saying “I promise”. She explained that the body is what gender is authorized from; in other words, gender is not the starting place, it is identity being repeatedly constructed through time due to the body’s construction. That gender does not come first, instead, it is created by the performance act. Gender is forced in opposition because the existence of the agency has constructed the binary gender system as definite.
Do you agree that Shakespeare presents Beatrice and Katherina as “offending against society’s expectations about women”? The idea that both Beatrice and Katherina offend against society’s expectations of women in the plays Much Ado About Nothing and The Taming of the Shrew is open to personal interpretation. We must take into account which society it is we are suggesting they are offending against, if we are judging it on Shakespearean society’s expectations we could, in theory, agree with the statement, due to the fact that at that time, women were largely expected to be submissive, quiet and respectful to the superior sex, males. However, it would not be correct to say that Beatrice and Katherina offend against modern day expectations of women. Further to this, it would also depend on at which point in the play we are making our judgement.
I want to argue that the feminist is somehow right, but Feminist also needs to see the context first. As we know that not all countries ratify the Human right towards their country. I would really agree with feminist’s action if the country that ratified is not implemented the woman’s right properly. For the example is human trafficking in Philippines. Philippine is ratify CEDAW in August 1981, one of the essentials point is about anti-human trafficking (Phillippine Commission on Women, 2015).
“War vs. Dialog” Professor of linguistics, and author of “The Argument Culture”, Deborah Tannen is trying to get people to “think of argument not as war or a fight but as a dialogue among a variety of different positions” (Tannen 475). Tannen convinces her readers that “adversarial debates which typically represent only two sides of an issue and thus promote antagonism, creates problems in communication” (Tannen 475). In this writing, Deborah Tannen is also trying to persuade that our argument culture is a problem. Even though there’s at time to fight and defend your point, The Argument Culture of Americans today is bad, waste of time, negative for the community and can worsen the relationship of the two arguing. To support her focus, Deborah goes about it and gives realistic, everyday life examples.
What is the definition of cultural relativism? Does the concept of cultural relativism promote international understanding, or does it hinder attempts to have international agreements on acceptable social behavior, such as human rights? According to Nancy Bonvillain (2010), the definition of cultural relativism is an approach in anthropology that stresses the importance of analyzing cultures in that culture’s own terms rather than in terms of the culture of the anthropologist. This does not mean, however, that all cultural behavior must be condoned. According to this article on the website by Got Question (2002-2012), “cultural relativism is the view that all beliefs, customs, and ethics are relative to the individual within his own social context”.
In this paper I will focus on quoting and analyzing the theories developed by Native women activists working in both sovereignty and feminist struggles. These analyses will hopefully complicate the somewhat simplistic manner in which Native women's activism is often portrayed. 

 One of the most well-known writings on Native American women and feminism is Annette Jaimes's 1992 article, “American Indian Women: At the Center of Indigenous Resistance in North America.” In this essay, Jaimes argues that Native women activists, except those who are “assimilated,” do not consider themselves feminists. Feminism, according to Jaimes, is an imperial construct that assumes the legitimacy of U.S. colonial strong hold on indigenous nations. Thus, in order to support sovereignty Native women activists reject feminist politics: 

 Those who have most openly identified themselves [as feminists] have tended to be among the more assimilated of Indian women activists, generally accepting of the colonialist ideology that indigenous nations are now legitimate sub-parts of the U.S. geopolitical corpus rather than separate nations, that Indian people are now a minority with the overall population rather than the citizenry of their own distinct nations.
Identifying Fallacies CRT/205 2. I believe that this example represents an inconsistency ad hominem. The example accuses Andrea Keene of having a double standard. The writer outlines how Andrea Keene has expressed her “abhorrence of abortion” and then describes how they don’t understand how she can be pro-life without being against fertility drugs. The author tries to discredit Andrea Keene’s opinions by making them seem inconsistent by comparing them to a different topic entirely.
Some principles of moral characterization and of moral permissibility, principles capable of explaining some of the moral condemnations, which Thompson expresses, but which remain all too vulnerable and obscure in her readings. The elaboration of those principles warrants those condemnations of abortion, which Thompson thinks mistaken as well as many of those attributions of human rights which she so much takes for, granted. She briefly state the reason why the fetus from conception has human rights, that is, should be given the same consideration as other human
Cultural Relativism, a term used to describe individual’s beliefs that should be accepted in one’s cultural but also can be denied in society. In James Rachels’ essay, “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”, she brings up varies examples that contradicts with one society’s beliefs to another society. She uses this term and analyzes it different situations proving that it can be controversial at times since no one should have the same thinking process as another person. For example, if you were to take to civilizations of the past and tell them to trade beliefs. They would find it outrages since it would be unorthodox to their teachings.