Critical Analysis of Retrocession and Reforms in Mauritius

966 Words4 Pages
The critical analysis of Retrocession And Reforms : Adele Simmons shows us the situation of the Creole community in the beginning of the 20th century and the failure of the Retrocession movement . The first paragraph describes the situation of ‘’ Creoles’’ after the British rule ,where the feeling of unity was at its peak (1907-1936).This movement was inspired from the philosophy of self determination implemented by Woodrow Wilson, the president of the United States Of America and one of the major actors of the treaty of Versailles .The concerned generation is that of DR Maurice Cure , which later on proceeded to the creation of his own political party. These people were mostly catholic and adopted a fully French lifestyle .These same people found it better to become a French colony once again ,despite them being professionals ( New history Of Mauritius ,K.Hazareesing) The above mentioned people (the retrocessionists ), had a deep feeling of disgust towards the British administration and therefore chose to back the other main administration ;which was the French one. It all started when Mauritians went to South Africa and discovered that coloured people there were victims of segregation and racism. Let us not forget that South Africa was under British administration at that time. On the other hand, the situation was much better in Reunion Island as coloured people could become deputies and therefore have a role in the great play; which was the political processus .Mauritians, after a century under British administration finally realised that they were only subjects and not citizens ,unlike people living in Reunion ,this meant that they had responsibilities ....but almost no rights. I would say that Mauritians temporarily forgotten that the relation between Mauritius and Britain was that of a colony to its coloniser. The ‘’creoles’’ having already

More about Critical Analysis of Retrocession and Reforms in Mauritius

Open Document