Grand Canyon JUS 110 MOD 6 DQ 1 How does the motivation of a serial killer differ from that of a terrorist? Grand Canyon JUS 110 MOD 6 DQ 2 Should different types of rape receive different punishments? For example, should someone who rapes a stranger be punished differently or more severely than someone who is convicted of raping a spouse or convicted of date rape? Why or why not? Grand Canyon JUS 110 MOD 7 DQ 1 Can social structure theories be used to explain white-collar crimes?
Why do we not use this type of corporal punishment for criminal offenders? Do you think we should? Explain your answer. DQ 2-Would you rather spend a year in prison or receive five years of probation with very severe restrictions? Could you envision a probationary sentence that was more severe than a custodial sentence?
While the “crime control” model contemplates that, the criminal justice system has an adverse consequence and progressively stops the process of arresting people within the criminal justice system. The “due process model” is demonstrating that a suspect is guilty and is significant to keeping the government under control and protecting the rights of the suspect. The criminal justice system should be expending more financial resources to employ more law enforcement officers instead of building more prisons and rather than expending money, defending the rights of citizens is the thought of the crime control model (Zalman,
These strategies include programs designed to reduce repeat victimization in domestic burglary, theft, and any other violence. Additionally, more money would be saved for much needed educational costs. Useful tactics such as probation, rehabilitation, and supervision would doubtlessly be more cost efficient and
But in contrast there are very different at the same time. The crime control model is used in the criminal justice system for the prevention of crime. The crime control does not exclude that is possible to make a mistake, but based on the circumstances of the laws, the person is considered guilty until her or she is proven innocent. This model is based on old fashion laws which allow rapid and speedy convictions despite the mitigating factors of the case and the victim. The results, of the crime control model are wrongful convictions, being over-turned and this is a major downfall in the criminal justice system.
In other crimes different that this, a plea bargain may be a viable option but in this particular case its not. A Plea bargain is when the suspect pleas guilty to a lesser charge in order to lower its punishment. The next steps are the pre-trial activities and the pre-liminary hearing is the next steps leading up to the trial. These two steps explain to the suspect and his attorney the evidence and the charges. If enough evidence is present a trail will be in act.
Topic I – The Process A. Warning before arrest B. Hold minor until parent arrives C. Refer to juvenile court D. Arrested Topic II – The Prosecutor A. Considerations B. Informal Proceedings C. Formal Proceedings D. Evaluate the juvenile Topic III – During incarceration A.
The criminal justice process is much like a funnel with a large opening at the top, tapering down to a much narrower opening at the bottom (Meyer & Grant, 2003). The illustration of the funnel refers to the reduced number of crimes reported, detected, and punished by the system, rather than the actual number essentially committed (Meyer & Grant, 2003). There are several reasons this may happen; the crime is never reported, the case was dismissed, or the case may have bees refer to treatment or counseling. The funnel decreases are due to case attrition. You could say that in the funnel model there are more suspects and defendants then there are inmates.
American Translation– This law means if you blame someone for a crime you have to arrest them, if you can’t prove they committed the crime, you will be executed. I think this law is bad because it’s wrong, If you blame someone for something and you really think they did it arrest them, yes, but if you can’t prove they committed the crime or have no evidence that they did it then set them free and try to find more evidence that the first person committed the crime, there’s no need to put a person to death because they can’t prove that someone
The two individuals that are on opposite sides of the death penalty are Edward Koch and David Bruck. The mayor Edward Koch believes that the death penalty is necessity for todays society. David Koch is saying that the death penalty is another form of murder. If someone were to kill another person, the authorities have all the rights to sentence them to death and to guarantee such a horrific crime would not happen again. Mayor Edward Koch claims that to help the penalty for murder would be a huge insult to the victims, other than David Bruck correctly argues that justice is not served by creating another victim accountable for the things that he or she have done.