In this paper, I plan to analyze the underlying causes of climate change, and the consequences the earth faces. Not only that, but also, I plan to unravel the obscurities and speculations so that we can get to the truth of this environmental issue. Some might say that global warming is not an issue, but rather a natural occurrence. I have investigated driving forces of past climate change such as astronomical and earthly cycles that seem to support this. Furthermore, there are arguments that global warming is not even a threat as assumed by the majority.
Should we support these environmentalists? Or could it be that the human race does not have a participating role in this climate change. Our climate is a combination of numerous weather conditions and meteorological factors. Next to these primary factors, many scientists believe that this model is also influenced by the humans. This human influence on the global temperature is linked with the “ozone depletion” and the “greenhouse effect”.
Case 19-1: Massachusetts v EPA Facts: A group of 19 private organizations filed a petition asking EPA to regulate “greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles under the Clean Air Act. Petitioners maintained that greenhouse gas emissions have accelerated climate change and that carbon dioxide is the most important contributor to climate change. EPA denied the petition, claiming that the Clean Air Act does not authorize the Agency to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. Even if it did, EPA argued, the Agency had discretion to defer a decision until more research could be done on "the causes, extent and significance of climate change and the potential options for addressing it." Massachusetts, other states and private organizations filed suit
As we are theoretically reaching “peak oil”, “peak gas” etc. as well as the occurring of global warming and a number of environmental issues, the call for more “clean”, “sustainable” renewable energy has been increasing dramatically. However, some critics argue that renewable energy such as wind, solar, biomass, alone can not sustain the world in the future. In this essay, I will argue that renewable energy is not a viable way for replacing established energy sources by analyzing the geographic and natural limitations, impacts on ecosystems and the efficiency on cutting greenhouse emissions of renewable energies. The real solution should be reducing energy consumption.
Answer: In the passage “Legal Drugs Unlikely to Foster Nation of Zombies” (Cederblom and Paulsen, 332-334), author Stephen Chapman provides a series of reasons to support his conclusion that drugs should be legalized. Chapman’s conclusion is essentially based on the premises that humans are capable of restraint when it comes to mind-altering drugs and that there is more harm done by prohibition of drugs then there would be if drugs were legalized. The author presents a series of arguments that suggest legalization of drugs would not lead to increased use or addiction. To support his arguments, the author attempts to discredit the opposing view by presenting poll results suggesting only a small number of people would try drugs if legalized. Further, the author provides statistics that indicate
In environmentalist Bill McKibben’s 2008 article, “Civilization Last Chance,” we are warned that we are in a state of emergency time we have little to save our environment from the danger. The current status of our earth is in danger, and people don’t seem to realize the serious consequence for the future. Robert W. Christopherson’s textbook, Geosystems, is an introduction to physical geography with scientific evidence. The current edition of Geosystems introduces the consensus science regarding human-created climate change. The high content of carbon causes global warming and global warming causes climate change.
Now that global warming has been studied further, there is still debate over whether the increase in the greenhouse gases are caused by natural sources, such as volcanoes and forest fires, or if it is caused by man-made practices such as emissions from driving automobiles (David). The controversy first gained national attention in 2005 when former vice president Al Gore released the documentary An Inconvenient Truth. Gore’s documentary is a compilation of scientific research, theories, and facts. All of which serve to prove that human activity as the main culprit of global warming. Although the issue did not start to gain national attention until the early 2000s, scientists have been studying atmospheric gases and the effect that human consumption of fossil fuels has on the atmosphere and climate since the early nineteenth century (Rich).
Polar bears may disappear as the sea ice continues to melt. Thus, scientists intend to figure out why the global temperatures have risen, but that thus far they have not found the solution for global warming. A few scientists think global warming is natural; however, the majority of plentiful scientists think global warming is manmade because of emissions from transportation, air conditioning and
For example, it might not be possible to know whether the global warming trend is part of a natural long-term cycle or is being caused by human activity. This doesn't mean
Myth or Fact Climate Change What is global warming? Everybody is talking about "climate change" and "global warming.” Actually, what are greenhouse gases? Some people say that scientists are over reacting and that the situation is not as bad as it seems. I believe that the stakes are high. Is climate change a myth or a fact?