Many of these people think that evolution disproves their religion and throws away their god and this is not true. Evolution is change over time in population so they can survive best in their environments. Evolution is a theory. A a scientific theory is a well-tested explanation that unifies a broad range of observations. Evolution is a well-tested explanation of how has changed over time.
However the unreliability of the results makes the claim an ongoing discussion and an open debate. The theory of evolution, first proposed by Charles Darwin (1809 – 1882) implies that all species are derived from common ancestors through natural selection (Phoenix, 2007 p.118-121). Natural selection is thought to be the main factor resulting in the diversity of species: it has been defined as a natural process, whereby only the variants best adapted to their environment develop the ability of a longer survival and pass on the best characteristics to future generations. Natural selection in species leads to 'adaptation' which is a change in behaviour as a consequence of surrounding modification. Within humans many adaptations have happened through Darwin’s theory of natural selection, one of these adaptations is called Theory of Mind.
Intelligent Design vs. Evolution A decades-long conversation about the origins of the world has escalated into a roaring debate about how science should be taught in public schools. Should evolution be taught alone in science classes, or should it be accompanied by alternate theories such as “intelligent design,” the belief that the Earth and its life forms were guided in their development by some unidentified higher intelligence? (GOD) Based upon me being a Christian, I believe that the theory of life origin was created and designed by God. The world around us that we see every day is probably best evidence and proof that God created the universe. The creation of the world was a miracle and cannot be explained by scientist.
Human development studies began with Darwin and other evolutionists who shared his theories. Darwin wanted to prove his theory of evolution; he believed the only approach to this was him studying human development. (Boyd& Bee, 2006) The definition of a lifespan is the average or minimum length of time an organism, material, or object can be expected to survive or last. (American Heritage Dictionary, 2000) The definition of development based on biology is the process of an individual organism growing organically a purely biological unfolding of events involved in an organism changing gradually from a simple to a more complex level. (Collins English Dictionary, 2003) Ultimately the two words conjoined define the methodical intra-individual change associated with progresses corresponding to age.
• The Theory of Archetypes - Geza Roheim argues that the theory of archetypes is unnecessary. As humans share the same experiences, such as dependence on parents, it is not surprising that they construct similar myths. Also, some religious myths come from the experiences of a particular community and so it seems unlikely that they are born out of an idea which is present in all humans. Therefore, it is argued that Jung is not justified in stating that there is an ‘instinct for God’ just because people believe in God. Also, many people do not believe in God.
In the Dialogues of Concerning Natural Religion by David Hume, he explains his thoughts concerning God and the higher power that in his opinion should not be accepted. “There is no ground to suppose a plan of the world to be formed in the Divine mind…”(Hume, 714). From this we can concur Hume is no full hearted believer that he considers God knows and will know what has to come. From his distinctions, there is no good reason for a designer, and to think that God is an all-powerful being that also is subject to human like or materialistic traits should not be looked upon as valid. From his theories the only way we can know things for sure is through cause and effect.
Kyle Vandermark 12-17-11 Period 5 Darwinism vs. Genesis The idea of Genesis has been accepted by the religion of Christianity, but not everyone believes about the idea of creation and the story of Adam and Eve. Darwinism is the opposing argument in this case, this is the idea of survival of the fittest, and only the ones who adapt to their surroundings can live on. Darwinism is generally taught or at least explained in school, because some schools aren’t able to have religion taught. This doesn’t mean Darwinism is superior over the idea of Genesis. The deception about philosophical questions such as this one, is that there is no real scientific answer, so this makes debates on the topic very interesting.
It has recently become common for religious groups to call for creationism (or ‘Intelligent Design’ as it is now called) to be recognised as having scientific support, but this is not as convincing as it seems. As the theory most supported by scientists, the onus of proof is on the creationists to show why a hundred years of solid science is now believed to be faulty. They have convincingly failed to do so. One of the fundamental flaws of creationism is that is begins with the assumption that a creator is responsible for life on earth, that the earth is
I strongly disagree with any notion that natural selection, or evolution shapes us in any way because the Bible tells us that “All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made” in John 1:3. Therefore, the natural selection and evolution theories do not hold up in light of God’s Word. While I believe that our personality, intelligence, athleticism, etc. may be partially inherited from our parents, it appears that they are mostly influenced by our environment. The Bible warns us that our influences can change our behaviors (see 1 Corinthians 15:33).
Christians could argue that they believe Jesus was still the Messiah and everything he stood for is what they believe in but maybe the authenticity of miracles today can be questioned as there is no Jesus around to prove them being performed by a Deity just as the definition says there should be. So believing in miracles would be hard to do because there is no proof because Christians just have to believe what the Bible says and can not question it even though there is no proof of miracles other than what the Bible says. It would be hard for Christians to believe in miracles because there is no evidence that supports them… (The Bible can’t be classed as evidence because it has no proof it’s real and could be a fictional book) But Christians would have to believe in them because if they disagree that would be sort of going against the belief of Jesus. I think Christians don’t have a choice and have to believe in miracles otherwise they’re going