Cottle and Taylor Analysis

261 Words2 Pages
1. Why do the forecasts differ? The forecast differ because: Patel wants to retain advertising expenditure at 9% of gross sales and still make sure a 20% increase in toothbrush unit sales which was primarily fueled by rising demand for modern oral care products in India and target rural audiences by persuading them to brush and increase the incidence of the same On the other hand Lang believed by increasing toothbrush related advertising and promotional spending by 3% and making it beyond 12% of the sales a unit growth rate of 25%-30% was achievable by shifting the product mix and messaging towards mid range and high end audience because a similar model was followed in Thailand and was successful. The audiences catered to by different alternatives vary hence the forecast differ. 2. Which forecast would you prefer to use to plan advertising strategy for Cottle-Taylor’s India business? Explain your preference. Lang’s forecast is more preferable to use to plan advertising strategy for Cottle-Taylor’s India business because shifting the product mix and messaging towards mid range and high end audience is more lucrative because in India more than 50% of the rural people did not use brushes to brush and Cottle had 38% of the market share which majorly included the urban consumers. Even 50% of the advertising expenditure was on television which reached the urban audiences mostly, therefore it made more sense to follow the 12% of sales, increase toothbrush related advertising and promotional spending in order to achieve a growth rate of 25%-30% in

More about Cottle and Taylor Analysis

Open Document