One of the biggest factors of receiving a good education is the type of teacher one has. Your teacher must be organized. If the teacher is not organized, how can they expect you to be. The teacher must also be experienced in that particular field he or she is teaching. Teachers who have a long background of experience know how to handle students, what they like, what they do not like, and they also have learned some personal strategies to deal with the difficult students.
As John Dewey once stated “Education is not preparation for life; education is life itself”, his perspective of education also emphasizes on the collaboration among learners to an end of academic achievement, just like how importance for people to interact with others if they are to succeed. Reading the excerpt from Democracy and Education (Dewey, 1916), we can be certain that the idea of the group in learning is, to Dewey, of crucial significance. Every single person has a different original environment from which he was born, raised, grew up, and thus is so rooted to it that escaping from the limitations of this social group is not a simple task. Yet Dewey believes the group in learning could give a mean for people to conquer the challenge and “come into living contact with a broader environment” since they not only perform their own action but also have to perceive that of others as reference and react to it. This whole process offers opportunities to break down “those barriers of class, race, and national territory which kept men from perceiving the full import of their activity”.
Not only that, but we all have different types of learning styles and to be able to gain as much of our education as possible we must think about which will have a negative impact on this. Both scenarios offer the same outcome, but there are positives and negatives to each choice. Attending a traditional classroom gives you the chance to have a face to face interaction with other students. This is how study groups, friendships, and a teacher to student relationship is formed. You must have some interaction with your fellow classmates and teachers in case you need help, have questions, or just do not understand the topic you can just ask.
At the same time, students are treated with decency by believing in their capacity to learn. Finally, students are evaluated based on the objectives of the course. These conclusions imply that teachers should be entirely devoted to their professions and fields of study in order to be effective educators. I do not believe that it is possible to teach effectively if one lacks interest and expertise in the subject. This
Education functions as a key mechanism which glues children together and helps them by giving them a value consensus through the “hidden curriculum”. Parsons describes education as a bridge between the families and adult roles of society. Although functionalists think that socialization is important, they also think that it’s not the only purpose of education. Education also teaches the right skills needed for work and sorts people for appropriate jobs. Functionalists think that education gives students an equal chance to get the qualifications for their future jobs and if they rather choose to mess about, the only person to blame for their failure is themselves.
They will see that their goal is to get good grades so their responsible to seek for help with tutoring and stay focused in school. Like, a student who doesn’t understand a topic will have to ask for help to get to a better understanding not just ignores it and forgets about it. It will just give students something to really shoot for. The benefits of it will be that students will work harder and increase their interest in learning. However, due to all the money earned from all the hard work it will help with financial aid for college.
That knowledge maybe helps us when we grow up and start working in our society. But, between two ideas, things learned in school or through life experiences, I think things learned through life experiences are more important to a person’s education, because beside what we learned in schools, there are also a lot of things we can learn outside our schools. First of all, we are just taught by our teachers and sometime by our friends at schools. Depend on teachers’ knowledge and the ways they teach in classes, the knowledge and information we input can be changed. Good teachers certainly have good teaching methods, but in a small space like school, those teachers are limited and what we can learn from them is few and limited too.
I know that school are not for everyone but I think that every children should go to school because if you don't go to school you will not be educate. I know that when you have an education it is a good thing. School is a place where you could learn a lot of different that you don't know. I know that I learn a lot of thing I didn't know but I know them. By going to school you make new friends, and you see the embodiment of the
Relativism vs. Absolutism: A Comparison of Logic and Implications When growing up everyone is told to “be nice”, “be a good person”, “if you have nothing good to say don’t say anything at all”, and similar things by their parents. Then it is our job to learn what is good and not as we grow and develop. People develop their ideals of what is good and bad through observing their parents, trial and error, learning from other’s mistakes, religion, school rules, and a variety of other sources. We are told to be good, but different sources might have very different definitions of what good is. A child could go to school and be taught to be nice to the other students and not steal their things; while after school this same child’s older siblings could be teaching him that he needs to earn respect from people through fear, and that stealing is a way to earn acceptance with friends.
Argument In today’s world there are many jobs that are being taken over by computers. I believe that schooling should be more technical where students are learning more about the field they are wanting to work in when leaving school instead of students learning the basic school curriculum they doesn’t and will not prepare a student for college or the job of their choice. Blinder, Davidson, and Krugman all have something in common; they feel that education should prepare students for their job of their choosing and feel that education should be reformed in the public school system. Education first starts with the parents by preplanning and helping their children’s dreams come true. By doing this and taking away from common core we can get back to the real education.