Conviction Politicians and Party Delegates

1142 Words5 Pages
To explain why some MPs behave more like party delegates rather than conviction politicians (15) MPs stands for Member of Parliament, these are people who sit in the Parliament and debate with the opposition party about different issues. Some MPs are party delegates, these MPs are the ones who follow the orders of the party leader and agree politely to what is being discussed by the leader even if they do not wish to do so, party delegates are not representative MPs because they do not take into account of the issues that are raised in their constituencies and take them to the Parliament. However there are also MPs that are known as conviction politicians, these MPs do not exactly follow the orders of their leader if they disagree with what is being said. Conviction politicians are representative and are more likely to take into account the issues that are raised among their constituencies by taking these issues to the parliament for a discussion. Conviction politicians truly speak out their minds regardless of what the consequences would be. One example of a conviction politician would be George Galloway who used be a member of Labour party. In the parliament you would see that there are more Party Delegates than Conviction Politicians. There are many reasons for why there are more party delegates than conviction politicians in the Parliament some of the reasons might be: Fear of being sacked and losing their job, money, fame, ego and status and many more. Some MPS choose to be party delegates rather than conviction politicians because they fear of being sacked and losing their job, by not listening to the leader and following orders, instead speaking up against the leader’s views which could put them in a position where they could lose their job. For example George Galloway who was a conviction politician and said things that he felt was right, he was sacked by
Open Document