Conventional vs Organic Farming

409 Words2 Pages
Although organic farming be more eco-friendly farming, conventional farming is more sustainable than organic farming By Vinicius Melo Organic farming is a form of agriculture, which avoids artificial inputs as pesticides, herbicides, synthetic hormones. Interest in organic products has been increased last years worldwide. According to The Organic Trade Association’s 2007 Manufacturer Survey, U.S. organic industry grew 21 percent overall to reach $17.7 billion in consumer sales in 2006. Despite this increasing, many difficulties remain, and conventional farming will continue to be more sustainable than organic one, for many reasons: environmental friendly, costs of farming and outputs products, sustainability. The first point of comparing is environment friendly. While organic farming uses insects’ predators as natural pest controls, conventional farming uses pesticides and herbicides. Animal manure, composting, crop rotation and cover cropping are used on the organic farming to improve soil fertility, while chemical fertilizers are used on the conventional farming. Due to the constant use of chemical products on the conventional farming, water degradation is increasing and it is a problem for the future generations. The second point is the costs of farming and output products. Inputs to organic farming cost are more expensive than conventional farming ones. Because of this, organic products tend to cost more than the others do. To label their products as organics, farmers must follow the rules laid down in standards designed by U.S. Department of Agriculture, submit to periodic inspections and meet a number of rigorous health standards. All of these requirements increase the production cost of the organic produce. Organic products can be 40 percent higher than the others can. The third point is the sustainability of conventional and organic

More about Conventional vs Organic Farming

Open Document