Studies show schools with sex education programs have less STDs and teen pregnancies in their schools. Sex education aims to reduce the potentially negative outcomes from sexual behavior such as unwanted or unplanned pregnancies and STDs(“sex education that works”)The main difference between abstinence based and comprehensive approaches to sex education is that comprehensive approaches do not focus either solely or so closely on teaching young people that they should abstain from sex until they are married. And although they do explain to young people the potential benefits of delaying having sex until they are emotionally and physically ready, they also make sure that they are taught how to protect themselves from infections and pregnancy when they do decide to have sex. Sexually active youth often live with anxiety about the possibility of an unwanted pregnancies of contracting an SDT because of being uneducated about sex. Soaring rates of STDs in teens are adding to the debate about sex education.
Sex education for the public school has been a huge controversial issue that happening in the United State of America for a very long period of time. Therefore, sex education is very important for teenagers to stay away from unwanted pregnancy or sexual diseases. The benefit of this program is to encourage the teenager to practice abstinence while acknowledging the fact that most teenagers will choose to engage in sex. Simply promotes abstinence while avoiding important topics like contraception and abortion is such a wrong thing. It also clear that sexually transmitted diseases is one of the main reasons to know much deeper the detail about sex education.
“Sexual Education in the Education System” In our country today exists many different ideas about sex education. Some believe in a comprehensive approach that covers everything: reproduction, anatomy, contraceptives, STDs, sexual orientation, values, body image and expressions of sexuality and some believe in an abstinence-only approach. The water becomes more unclear when we talk about classroom delivery of sex education to young teens and the possible bias, values, or morals of those teaching young teens. To live in a progressive modern society such as ours in the 21st century, the need for sex education might seem to many to be to be obsolete. It might seem it was an issue for past generations.
Soaring rates of sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancies among these teens are adding urgency to the debate over sex education. Sex education in schools will lead to healthier sex behavior among the students in their later lives. II. Some conservatives claim the alarming statistics illustrate why abstinence should be the single topic when it comes to sexual education, others say it should not be part of the school curriculum. Liberals counter that the increase in disease is the strongest case for more detailed information.
In a perfect world, every parent would pass on the knowledge they need to conduct safe and happy sex lives. Unfortunately, this is not a perfect world and the sooner parents realize this, the better. Since sex is a confidential subject, some parents believe that the subject should be taught solely in the home. They believe that schools should not be teaching subjects involving sex because it may conflict with their own values, and some parents do not want schools promoting sex at all. According to Mindy Craver, an educator from Planned Parenthood, parents are the prime educators for their children when it involves sex.
Running head: SEX EDUCATION FOR SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN 1 Sex Education for School Age Children There is an ongoing debate in America about funding sex education programs from state to state. The debate focuses on whether or not the sex education programs should be comprehensive, or if the programs should be a required course of study in middle school and high school. The debate is centered on the advantages of abstinence-only applications vs. more inclusive education programs that also educate the children about sexually transmitted diseases, birth control, and pregnancy. There is an abundant amount of data and research that shows the importance of funding sex education programs for middle and high school students. According to Sullivan-Anderson (2009), "We now have a pretty good sense of which sex-education approaches work."
There are many ways in which a teenage pregnancy can be prevented. The most popular solution would be NOT to have sex as a teen. Having “safe sex” is another way to prevent a pregnancy of a teen. Making sure that all teens have the access of a sexual education class in their early years, such as in middle school will help in detouring them from wanting to have sex, especially after being educated about what happens when someone has sex. As well as knowing the facts of how it can change their lives forever.
Ignoring these issues and burying our heads in the sand is not going to solve anything. It is our time now to plan and discuss what the future will be for our highly impressionable children. It is time to look at the facts and pick a real solution that will ensure success for future generation bringing forth the need to educate our children about the truths and realities on sex at large. The debate over the avenue that should be taken for education goes back decades. There is a strong belief that sex education in schools promotes sexual activity; others believe that sex education should come with life experiences, or be taught by parents and through religious sources.
This crisis of teenage pregnancy and unplanned parenthood must be addressed. The scale and importance of immediate, short-term sexual and reproductive health problems among adolescents is significant (Ross 2). Educating teenagers about contraception makes those young people more likely to use contraception when they begin having sex. As one author asserts, “Contraceptive focused sex education programs may be effective at reducing risky sexual behavior among those who participate” (Kearney 2). Teaching teenagers about contraceptive options decreases teen pregnancy rates.
Abstinence-plus Education first, encourages teens to be abstinence, but recognizes that abstinence may not be the choice for all teens. Even though, comprehensive sex education greatly emphasizes the benefits of being abstinent, Abstinence-only opponents argue that educating teens on sex before marriage is immoral and should not be taught in schools. On the other hand, what does that approach say to gay and lesbian students forbidden by law to “marry” in a legal sense (Wiley)? However, Abstinence-only Education is being taught in many public schools throughout the country, but studies show that more than 50 percent of students between the ages of 13-15 have already engaged in some type of sexual activity. In addition, the majority of those teens were unaware of the health risk and impact that unprotected or premature sex can have on their lives.