Contraversial Speakers should be allowed on college campuses

643 Words3 Pages
Contraversial Speakers Allowed on College Campuses Many controversial speakers are wrongfully perceived as hazards to many communities, when in fact, they should be highly respected for going against the grain and daring to be different by challenging the current knowledge. College campuses around the nation are banning multiple speakers in fear that a riot might break out or someone might get offended. Currently, controversial speakers are glared at as mere trouble makers, but they should be appreciated because of how passionately they bring new ideas to the table, and they, most definitely, should be allowed to speak at college campuses. One of the major reasons why controversial speakers should be allowed to speak at college campuses is college students need these speakers to listen to and develop their own opinions. They could do this by going to a debate between two controversial speakers, listen to both points, then think about what was said and form their own point of view. For example, controversy rose at Yale University in 2006 when a student said, “It would be unusual for the University ever to turn down a speaker wanting to visit campus, because we are interested in what they have to say.” Ultimately, the decision should be left in the hands of the students. Matt Dixon, journalist for the Marquette Tribune, said, “University professors are not allowed to require their students to attend the lectures.” These students are adults and old enough to make their own decisions and listen to what they choose to. In order to answer the question, should controversial speakers be allowed on college campuses, we first need to see if there are any reasons why they shouldn’t be allowed on campuses. If controversial speakers aren’t causing a disturbance and they remain peaceful, they should not have restrictions put on them. Harry Etra, president of Yale
Open Document