Contrast the Nature and Spatial Distribution of World Cities with Mega Cities in the Developing World?

938 Words4 Pages
Contrast the nature and spatial distribution of world cities with mega cities in the developing world? World cities= Tokyo, New York, London and Paris Mega Cities= Mexico City, Lagos, Beijing, Bangkok The nature, character and spatial distribution of world and megacities is dictated by the function they perform in the globalised economy, where they fall in the hierarchy of dominance and dependence, and their importance nationally and locally as a result of their role within their own nations. Nature The nature or world cities are largely defined by the process of globalisation. Since the 1950s the economics of the world richest economies have been increasingly integrated into the global economy, to such an extent now that they perform the role of command and control centres. This has occurred as a result of rapid advances in transport and telecommunications technology, such that it is now possible to buy and sell stock, place orders for delivery/production of good and discuss business strategy at the click of a button. World cities are cities such as New York, London, Paris and Tokyo, and they fall into global hierarchy of dominance and dependence more of which will be discussed in character. Mega cities in the developing world contract a great deal to this. Whereas world cities play important roles globally, megacities in the DW tend to have their influence limited to the nation in which they exist. This is a result of the fact that more than 40% of the less developed nations population live in megacities; making them large hubs for population, employment and free riding off services such as sanitation and water not provided in rural areas (and only marginally supplied in megacities incidentally). Mega cities in the developed world provide bases for national governance and NGO’s, and the role shall be likewise discussed further in character. Character
Open Document