As of June 28 2012 the Supreme Court ruled that basically if a person doesn’t buy health insurance then the fee is counted as a tax. The Obama administration tried to argue against the ruling stating that the fee should just count as a penalty instead of a tax. The Supreme Court didn’t agree with the Obama Administration so they turned the decision down. Chief Justice John Roberts believes that the payment of health insurance is not that high so it should be no choice but to get it. Also the payments are collected by the IRS through taxation.
On June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that the Federal government does not have the right to make it mandatory for people to have to buy health insurance from a private company. However, it does have the right to tax those that don't. The Court struck down the idea that states people must add people to Medicaid. However, many states will still take advantage of this portion of Obama Care because the Federal government will not take the bill away until it as shown negative effects. So until the Federal government takes it away states will take advantage of gaining extra money from taxes being paid from those who don’t invest into getting health insurance.
Some of the conservatives' innovations were validate campaign finance laws. The "secondary effects" philosophy, for example, allows government to restrict speech if government can suggest a general, non-speech-related purpose, even if the real purpose is speech-related. The court ignored this philosophy in Citizens' United and other campaign finance cases—even though campaign finance reform is aimed not at speech itself, but at massive amounts of money that skew, corrupt, and undermine
Holding The trial court found that the defedant was negligent as both attorney and officer and fined him $243,722.99. Musselman appealed this decision saying that he lacked the capacity to act as officer and/or attorney. Rationale The trial court found that their decision will be affirmed because not only did Atty Musselman have the capacity to work as attorney and officer but he did so and he did not inform the corporation that Hurt wanted to be ecused from all personal
Discuss the different reasons listed in your text as to why national health insurance has not developed in the U.S. A reason why National Health Care has failed in the United States is because it failed to get an early start due to labor and political views. Also, the AMA had a history of opposing national healthcare initiatives. Other reasons were that the middle class Americans opposed to increasing the taxes that would benefit in the program. The middle class had traditional beliefs and values that consist with capitalism, self-determination, and distrust of big government. 2.
A main detail about this would be that Romney’s is constitutionally and Obama’s is not but only potential. Through collaboration Massachusetts created a consensus among state holders to support the new law with Romney’s healthcare while Obama does NOT take into account that each state is unique in important ways such as some states can’t afford new spending on healthcare and second being greater costs will be imposed on states with a larger percentage of uninsured citizens. As you’ve heard Romney’s proposal was much more conservative friendly than the democrats passed under Barack Obama. Romney said “My own preference is to let each state fashion its own program to meet the distinct needs of its citizens. States could follow the Massachusetts model if they choose, or they could develop plans of their own.
Unit Nine: Case Studies Assignment Nicole McDonald Kaplan Univeristy HS 100-08 Scenario #1 Do you think Mindy dresses appropriately for the medical facility? Why or why not? I do not think that Mindy dresses appropriately for the medical facility because she has face piercings that a person who works in a medical facility should not have. She also has multicolored hair which is a big no-no in most businesses. At my work, you are only allowed to have one different color besides your natural hair color (whether it is your natural hair color or dyed hair color).
The state of Confusion enacted a law to control commerce that the federal government had not regulated for some time. However, Confusion’s regulation cannot improperly inconvenience interstate commerce because it would be unconstitutional. Tanya Trucker’s Road to Succeeding Tanya Trucker’s likelihood of prevailing in this case is optimistic. The fact that Confusion is executing an unconstitutional act by initiating a statute to require B-type truck hitches on their roadways gives Trucker a legal advantage to succeed in a civil suit. The State of Confusion would have to generate a constitutionally valid reason for requiring B-type truck hitches not only in their state, but also on all national roadways.
His views on life tenure and judicial reviews were split upon the framers and intimidated anti federalist, but it is the most methodological way to deal with the separation of powers and prevent different branches from overpowering one another. Although I agree with his claims that the Judicial branch is the least dangerous, because the lack of direct involvement and inability to initiate a change, I believe that without the Judicial branch, the separation of powers would be missing a key feature to prevent a tyranny. Without the Judiciary, it would be easy for the government to take advantage of their powers and overrule the
November 23, 2013 American National Government “ObamaCare” On March 23, 2010, President Barack Obama signed off on the healthcare act known as the Affordable Care Act that we also call “ObamaCare”. This is the national health care plan aimed at reforming the American health care system. This was thought of to provide more affordable health insurance. ObamaCare was put together with thoughts of lowering the uninsured rate by expanding public and private insurance coverage, and reducing the costs of healthcare for individuals. With ObamaCare, many are reaping the benefits, but not everyone is happy about the impact of this act.