Consent in Democracy

1563 Words7 Pages
Democracy through ages has taken many forms. All of them needed one basic ingredient in order to exist; other people to be governed. A modern democracy is preferable to other existing forms of government because it forces decision-makers to take into account the interests and views of all people in society. With the majority of the views of people take into account the will of the people, also known as the consent of the governed, a democratic government can be held better. Democracy respects the human rights of the individuals, better than any other form of government. Without going into confusing arguments, let's stop and think for a moment. If you are a leader of a democratic nation and you are abusing your power or using your power in the wrong way to restrict or violate somebody else's rights, what will happen? There are two possible outcomes. You can be blamed or voted out of your position, both of which ensure the removal of the leader from abusing society. Besides, most people in society do not like to be abuse of power. The term of government and of democracy are independent terms and do not, from what I can see, depend on one another. What is likely required for the masses of people, as we see in "modern" world societies, is an established system of government. Where there is a need for an established system of government, it will likely be established whether or not, it has the consent of the people. An individual or group of individuals may take and maintain power by the use of coercive force. From history we can see that this is the usual way by which power is gained, and maintained. However, it has long been understood that people might come together and agree to put someone in power. The process is that groups have to choose a leader. A precise definition of democracy is a form of government in which the sovereign power resides in the people as a
Open Document