conflicting perspectives Essay

1375 WordsAug 2, 20106 Pages
Conflicting perspectives appear within both texts individually and inter-textually. These perceptions evidently polarize common ideologies emitted, which through comparison, the responder can react and conclude profound individual responses. Shakespeare’s dramatic play, Julius Caesar presents a variety of perspectives that clash, providing deeper understandings of the text. A contrasting textual form to the play, the historical account Life of Brutus by Plutarch presents a far more objective view as the intentions and features of the text are distinct. Spielberg’s film Munich parallels with “Julius Caesar”, allowing the audience to understand differing reactions to similar situations, enforcing a deeper thought pattern into thematic concepts. In Julius Caesar Shakespeare manipulates the perspectives of Brutus and the Plebian’s on the assassination of Caesar, portraying that “blood will have blood” (Macbeth). Brutus’ motives of killing Caesar is euphemized through juxtaposition of binary opposite consequences in the rhetorical question in his funeral speech, “have you rather Caesar living, and die all slaves than Caesar were dead to live all freemen?” This illuminates the good nature and reasoning behind the assassination, intending to create an image of nobility and patriotism. This is immediately conflicted with the dramatic and ferocious reactions of the Plebian’s created by Shakespeare through the use of high modality language in exclamatory statements such as “O traitors, Villains! // Revenge! Burn! Seek! Fire! Kill!” These cumulatively listed images of destruction conflicts the reaction of understanding and respect intended from Brutus’ speech. These distinct perspectives have ultimately accentuated the violence that has risen from the assassination, as the blood revealed from one deed has led to blood being shed in another. The parallels from Spielberg’s

More about conflicting perspectives Essay

Open Document