Confirmation of George Washington and the Cherry Tree

586 Words3 Pages
When human beings castigate authors of America’s past on a cool autumns day (Chronographia), they are condemning the olden days itself. How can humanity try to discredit the authors without additionally discrediting the olden days they document? One of the crystal clear actions in this tale is when young Washington's hacking goes unseen. For what reason doe the haters have to want to discredit it? An individual may remark, "The plantations slaves would have noticed his hacking." An understandable scholar, however, comprehends that the racket of hacking would not cause panic in any plantation worker. Farm workers are worker ants, used to the noise of workers toiling all day. If it is not clear that hacking, slashing, and chopping all go unobserved on plantations, then either the haters have no comprehension of what is done on a farm or they think this plantation was the omission to all others. Haters go on stating it is absurd that young Washington's father would have bestowed on him an ax without making it clear that George was not to go near the crimson tree. Why do the haters attempt to rewrite this behavior? Someone may retort, "Young Washington would not have hacked down his father’s Cherry Tree if Mr. Washington had educated him." Critics are rude coyotes. If this statement is genuine, then either whippersnappers never disregard the rules or parents constantly train their children. Judgers keep saying it is inconceivable that a child brought up on a plantation would chop down a cherry tree. For what cause do the judgers have to want to disclaim this action? Considering children with new gadgets are often imprudent, and since young George had just received an ax, then it is to no surprise that he heedlessly used it. It is conceivable, therefore, that the lad carelessly hacked down his father's favorite cherry tree. Young boys with axes are Cyclopes

More about Confirmation of George Washington and the Cherry Tree

Open Document