Only time will tell. It's interesting to note that all of the above gun control laws were bitterly opposed by the NRA. If these four states' waiting period and background check laws can stop a few thousands prohibited purchasers of handguns, how many more can be stopped with the Brady Bill nationwide? The yearly estimates run from 50 to 100,000 a year. Yes, gun control will work if given a chance.
Local agencies have been involved in the gun control issue for many years. When interviews were conducted of local law enforcement and other prospective agencies; the majority feel that crime would drop substantially if more people owned and could properly use a firearm. A small percentage did agree with the current political views, that the problem in this country is that guns are to easily assessable to the general public. Many of the officers interviewed are retired sheriff’s department in Texas and Colorado, in these agencies the consensus is that stricter gun laws will not detour violent or aggravated crime. The application of stricter gun control laws will in fact hinder law enforcement agencies across America.
Is Open Carry a Solution Is Open Carry a Solution Responsible, law abiding citizens, should be allowed to openly carry their weapons, in order to diminish crime and assist law enforcement in battling law breakers. According to the Second Amendment the people have the right to keep and bear arms. It does not, however, state that these arms should be openly visible to the rest of the people (“U.S. constitution – amendment 2,” n.d). Advocates of open carry often refer to their constitutional rights of being law abiding and responsible gun holders.
He mentioned how Feinstein’s previous ban did not prevent, control or stop the Columbine School massacre. Sen. Grassley said “there is "no evidence" that the Feinstein ban would reduce multiple-victim shootings or wounds per victim.” He couldn’t have been more on point. The obvious and biggest problem of the ban assault weapon 2013 is that is violates our right to the 2nd Amendment, the right the bear arms. If this ban would be passed, it will show that in the future, it will be that much easier
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's Fatality Analysis Reporting System, within the past 10 years, almost 150 people have died from motorcycle accidents in the state of Idaho. Of these fatalities, over 60% were not wearing a helmet. A recent study (Orsay et al., 1994) published in the Center for Disease Control's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, estimates the use of a properly fitted and secured helmet can reduce the risk of death by over 25%, and reduce serious head trauma in a motorcycle accident by almost 35%. Yet many people still refuse to wear a helmet. The financial burden to society from these accidents is staggering.
Rumsfeld the Supreme Court addressed the issue of citizens being held as enemy combatant, and being denied Habeas Corpus. The court ruled that a citizen being held as an enemy combatant is entitled to due process and an opportunity to contest the facts of his detention (James, 2005). James agreed that the court had correctly reasoned that the President did have the authority to detain both citizens and non citizens indefinitely as enemy combatants, after it has been established that the individual is actually an enemy combatant. However, he feels that the opinion did not go far enough in defining the term enemy combatant, and will not be adequate in instructing the lower courts in future cases (James,
Courts will not apply the rule to exclude illegally gathered evidence where the costs of exclusion outweigh its deterrent or remedial benefits. Thus, the rule is not triggered when courthouse errors lead police officers to mistakenly believe that they have a valid search warrant, because excluding the evidence would not deter police officers from violating the law in the future (Arizona v. Evans, 1996). In this case, no warrant was obtained and, given the improper consent to search, the motion to exclude the physical evidence filed by William Ellis’s attorney would in all likelihood be granted. In sum, the Supreme Court has addressed the issue of a “murder scene” exception to the warrant requirement on three separate occasions spread out over a twenty year period. In each instance, the Court has emphatically rejected the notion that such an exception exists.
The law calling for repeal required that the action be delayed until President Obama certified that the military was ready for the change, which he did in July 2011. Pentagon officials said that nearly two million service members had been trained in preparation for gay men and women serving openly in their ranks. The extended preparation period had been sought by military leaders and Pentagon officials, many of whom were initially reluctant to end the policy in the middle of two wars. In 2010, shortly after Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates came out in favor of repeal, he ended the practice of discharging any service member whose sexual orientation had been revealed by a third party. The president had campaigned on a promise to seek an end to the policy, which was put in place by Congress after an attempt by President Bill Clinton to lift the ban on gays serving in the military entirely backfired in the face of strong opposition from the Pentagon.
"Since the expiration of the federal Assault Weapons Ban two years ago, there has been a significant rise in violent crime and homicides. Passing an assault weapons ban must be one of the top domestic safety priorities of the 110th Congress." FBI statistics show that "assault weapons" are used in less than 2% of gun crimes; they simply are not the preferred gun of criminals. Criminals use what is readily available to them, they do not go out and spend $1000 on a gun that they can't conceal and probably don't know how to operate. Ten months after the last Assault Weapon Ban lapsed in 2004, violent crime had dropped
Weapons would fall under is one of the leading subjects where there are many misconceptions. This is caused by people having several different viewpoints and different ideas on what on what falls under the second amendment and what should be narrowed down in the second amendment. One of the most divisive areas that gun control changes the amount of violent crimes in America. The national rifle association and the gun control activists are now in a series of court cases trying to defend their sides of the gun control debate. The media is spreading a lot of false persuasions for gun which makes this subject so diverse and so argumentum.