Comparitive Essay

641 WordsApr 23, 20133 Pages
Comparative Essay The Roman and Han empires both declined due to economic, political, and social problems. While Rome suffered from political decline due to unequal land distribution, the Han struggled because of the problem with unequal power of the ruling elites. In Rome and in the Han empires, their decline can be blamed partially on the invasion of nomadic peoples. As a result of the increasing number of merchants along the silk roads, disease spread epidemically throughout Rome and the Han and it led to the social decline of both empires. While the Han and Roman empires declined socially from epidemic disease and wealth problems, they differed in the fact that Rome partially declined because of unequal land distribution and the Han declined because the dispute between the ruling elites. While Rome had suffered from political decline due to unequal land distribution, the Han struggled because of unequal power with the ruling elites. Unequal land distribution caused uproar in the economy which made the lower class citizens upset because the land was being unequally and unfairly distributed. A prime example is the Latifundia. They specialized in agriculture destined for export, and were run by slave labor. The Han Empire did not have equal power with the ruling elites. The yellow Turban Uprising (184–c. 204 Ce), contributed to the fall of the Han dynasty. The rebellion was directed against the tyrannical eunuchs who dominated the emperor. To quiet the noise, the Han conscripted huge armies at great cost, but their efforts were hampered by inefficiency and corruption in the imperial government. The Han and Rome both declined partially because of the uncontrolled economy. In Rome and in the Han, the decline of their empires can be blamed partially on the invasion of nomadic peoples. In Rome there was trouble with securing the eastern borders. Upon the decline

More about Comparitive Essay

Open Document